Electrical Commissioning In Industrial Power Systems
Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.
- Live Online
- 12 hours Instructor-led
- Group Training Available
California renewable energy standards aim for 33% by 2020, prioritizing in-state solar, wind, and geothermal via RPS rules, while debates over executive orders, transmission lines, ratepayer protection, and out-of-state credits shape implementation.
Breaking Down the Details
RPS targets 33% renewables by 2020, emphasizing in-state generation, transmission buildout, and ratepayer protections.
- 33% renewable portfolio standard target by 2020
- Preference for in-state solar, wind, and geothermal
- Limited imports and tradable renewable energy credits
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's office said that he would veto legislation requiring a third of California's energy to come from renewable sources by 2020, choosing instead to mandate the change through an executive order.
The Democratic bills that passed the state Legislature just before the end of the legislative session would have set up the most aggressive renewable energy standards in the nation.
But they also sought to limit the amount of energy from sources such as wind, solar and geothermal that could come from out-of-state. Gov. Schwarzenegger and some energy producers said the legislation would set up too many regulatory hurdles.
"The poorly drafted, overly complex bills passed by the Legislature are protectionist schemes that will kill the solar industry in California and drive prices up like the failed energy deregulation of the late 1990s," Schwarzenegger's communications director, Matt David, said in a statement.
The governor's office didn't immediately explain how Schwarzenegger would implement the goals of the legislation through the clean energy plan executive order. Supporters worry that it would not have the same strength of law as the bills would have.
The Independent Energy Producers, which represents companies that provide 80 percent of California's renewable energy, opposed the legislation, despite having sought a higher standard.
Jan Smutny-Jones, the association's executive director, said some of the language in the bills would have limited the placement of solar power plants in some areas of the state, threatening projects that are already underway and others that are expecting to get funding through the federal stimulus package.
"The bill basically is sort of a dog's breakfast of bad ideas in terms of how it moves us forward," he said.
Consumer advocates and environmental groups sought the limits on out-of-state power because they wanted the bulk of California's renewable energy to be generated within the state. They said it would help promote job growth.
Environment California urged Schwarzenegger to reconsider.
"Creating a hard mandate with the force of law behind it for this 33 percent-by-2020 goal is critical to meeting California's global warming goals, much championed by Gov. Schwarzenegger, as well as bringing upward of 200,000 green jobs to the state," the group's legislative director, Dan Jacobson, said.
The legislation would have allowed utilities to import renewable energy generated outside California as long as the power came from a plant that connects to California's electricity grid.
Utilities also could buy a limited number of credits from out-of-state producers of alternative energy as a way to promote the development of clean power, and some plan to buy more solar power to comply, even though that power would not reach California markets.
Republicans said the restrictions could drive up energy costs for Californians by as much as $10 billion a year; A backer of the legislation, Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, said concerns over cost increases were being exaggerated.
California already has one of the most aggressive standards of the 31 states that require utilities to generate a certain amount of their power from renewable sources, according to the Arlington, Va.-based Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
In Hawaii, utilities must generate 40 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2030 — a longer timeframe than the goal being debated in California.
California's investor-owned utilities also are legally required under a green mandate to generate at least 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by next year, but few are expected to meet that goal.
The California Public Utilities Commission also has said the state's utilities will need to build additional transmission lines and other infrastructure to move more renewable energy. Construction could cost $115 billion over 10 years.
Schwarzenegger sent legislators a detailed letter in May outlining his requirements for a renewable energy standard, including protection for utility ratepayers, removing barriers to building more transmission lines and creating a healthy energy market.
Related News
Related News
American Households Struggle with Sky-High Energy Bills During Extreme Summer Heat
Climate Solution: Use Carbon Dioxide to Generate Electricity
Analysis: Why is Ontario’s electricity about to get dirtier?
US Approves Rule to Boost Renewable Transmission
Portsmouth residents voice concerns over noise, flicker generated by turbine
Six key trends that shaped Europe's electricity markets in 2020
Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter
Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE
- Timely insights from industry experts
- Practical solutions T&D engineers
- Free access to every issue