North Carolina, Duke Energy ask court to let EPA revise air rules

subscribe

The North Carolina attorney general's office and Duke Energy Corp. said a federal appeals court shouldn't throw out a Bush administration initiative to cut power-plant pollution, but instead should allow the Environmental Protection Agency to revise the rules.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down the EPA emission regulations in July, siding with North Carolina, Duke and other utility companies. Duke expects others will join the company in its request.

The appellate court decision threw into disarray emission-allowance markets and the environmental plans of many utilities.

It remains unclear whether companies will have to comply with the regulations, known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule, starting next year. The regulations are aimed at cutting emissions of unhealthy pollutants and particulate matter in 28 states by tightening the cap on sulfur-dioxide emissions and establishing a new cap on emissions of nitrogen oxides.

Although the court ruled against the EPA regulations in July, it hasn't issued a mandate yet to invalidate them. The EPA appealed the decision, and the court is seeking opinions from North Carolina, Duke and others by Wednesday on whether it should vacate the rule as planned, or delay the mandate while the EPA makes revisions.

Duke executives said in a conference call with analysts that the company doesn't believe it's appropriate to eliminate the entire rule to fix it, referring to that approach as "throwing out the entire baby with the bath water."

The legal battle over the rules is creating considerable uncertainty. At issue is whether the rules would remain in effect while EPA makes revisions, and if so, how long that process would take, said Peter Zaborowsky, a managing director for environmental brokerage Evolution Markets.

The new regulations in 2009 require additional allowances for the emission of nitrogen oxide. Although power producers don't need these credits right away, he said, they'll want to start factoring them in to the cost as they make pricing decisions for plants. At the same time, the market for allowances has come to a halt because of the lack of clarity, Zaborowsky said.

Related News

Site C Dam

OPINION | Bridging the electricity gap between Alberta and B.C. makes perfect climate sense

VANCOUVER - By Mark Jaccard

Lost in the news and noise of the federal government's newly announced $170-per-tonne carbon tax was a single, critical sentence in Canada's updated climate plan, one that signals a strategy that could serve as the cornerstone for a future free of greenhouse gas emissions.

"The government will work with provinces and territories to connect parts of Canada that have abundant clean hydroelectricity with parts that are currently more dependent on fossil fuels for electricity generation — including by advancing strategic intertie projects."

Why do we think this one sentence is so important? And what has…

READ MORE
london-underground-power-outage-disrupts-rush-hour

London Underground Power Outage Disrupts Rush Hour

READ MORE

strong-winds-knock-out-power-across-miami-valley

Strong Winds Knock Out Power Across Miami Valley

READ MORE

three mile island nuclear power plant

Three Mile Island at center of energy debate: Let struggling nuclear plants close or save them

READ MORE

damaged power grid

New Power Grid “Report Card” Reveal Dangerous Vulnerabilities

READ MORE