Taking the Grid for Granted


Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
When Dennis Hastert, the speaker of the House, returns to work in January, he will find on his desk a letter from John Dingell of Michigan, a colleague wise in the ways of energy legislation. The letter asks Mr. Hastert to forget about trying to pass the omnibus energy bill and to focus instead on a narrower measure aimed at improving the reliability of the country's electrical transmission system. Mr. Dingell has the right idea.

More than four months have passed since the blackout in August 2003 that caused most of the northeastern United States and parts of Canada to go dark. Virtually nothing has been done to cut the risk of a recurrence. There have been no structural changes in the system, no investigative teams dispatched to carry out a nationwide survey of individual utilities or operating systems.

All we have seen are baby steps. An industry association called the North American Electric Reliability Council has sent out a questionnaire asking its 167 members what steps they are taking to prevent future failures, but sending out questionnaires is not the same thing as sending in auditors.

Meanwhile, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which mostly oversees economic issues, has begun to explore whether it has any real authority to improve reliability. The short answer is, not much — which is where Mr. Dingell's bill comes in. It would authorize the federal commission and the industry council, working together, to impose mandatory operating standards on the industry and penalize companies that do not meet them. The standards that now exist are purely voluntary.

Mr. Dingell's bill would not address other issues — whether, for example, there should be a whole new system of regional organizations to manage the grid, or the even larger question of whether deregulation has fostered a corporate culture in which maintaining reliability is less important than maximizing profits. But it represents a common-sense first step toward a safer grid. Moreover, unlike the broader energy bill, it would be quickly approved if Mr. Hastert allowed it to come to the floor for a vote.

Related News

Sierra Club: Governor Abbott's Demands Would Leave Texas More Polluted and Texans in the Dark

Texas Energy Policy Debate centers on ERCOT and PUC directives, fossil fuels vs renewables, grid…
View more

Is Ontario's Power Cost-Effective?

Ontario Nuclear Power Costs highlight LCOE, capex, refurbishment outlays, and waste management, compared with renewables,…
View more

27,000 Plus More Clean Energy Jobs Lost in May

U.S. Clean Energy Job Losses highlight COVID-19 impacts on renewable energy, solar, wind, and energy…
View more

Latvia eyes electricity from Belarus nuclear plant

Latvia Astravets electricity imports weigh AST purchases from the Belarusian nuclear plant, impacting the Baltic…
View more

Solar power growth, jobs decline during pandemic

COVID-19 Solar Job Losses are erasing five years of workforce growth, SEIA reports, with U.S.…
View more

Alberta shift from coal to cleaner energy

Alberta Coal-to-Gas Transition will retire coal units, convert plants to natural gas, boost renewables, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified