Huge air pollution fines for biomass plants


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Ampersand Biomass Fines highlight EPA enforcement over ozone-related emissions in California's San Joaquin Valley, citing nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide violations at Chowchilla and Merced plants, impacting regional air quality and public health.

 

At a Glance

Over $800,000 in penalties on Ampersand for ozone-forming emissions violations at Chowchilla and Merced plants.

  • EPA levied over $800,000 for ozone-related emission violations.
  • Sites: Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass and Merced Power.
  • Pollutants exceeding limits: NOx, CO, and sulfur dioxide (SO2).

 

Two biomass plants, intended to help the San Joaquin Valley clean up the air, have been tagged with one of the state's largest air-pollution fines in recent history.

 

Global Ampersand of Boston was fined more than $800,000 for excess ozone-related emissions and other violations from biomass plants in Madera and Merced counties, federal authorities announced recently.

The fine is among the largest in the San Joaquin Valley and California over the past several years, say officials at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Though they didn't have specific numbers, officials said fines of nearly $1 million, such as the El Paso Electric fine seen elsewhere, are unusual in California.

Ampersand agreed to the fines for violations that began in 2008 at the Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass in Madera County and Merced Power near El Nido, the EPA said. The biomass plants burn woody waste from farms and cities to create electricity.

Ampersand agreed to reduce ozone-forming oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide, similar to Oklahoma coal plant cleanup orders seen in other states as well. Company officials could not be reached for comment.

The large fine reflects the amount of pollution and duration of the violations. The violations took place during 2008, 2009 and 2010.

The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District discovered the problems.

Biomass plants are considered a cleaner option than open-field agricultural burning, which has been mostly banned in the Valley.

But modern biomass plants must meet strict standards to prevent adding to the air-quality problems, especially in the Valley.

Valley ozone pollution is among the worst in the nation.

Ozone is a corrosive, warm-weather gas that scars the lungs and triggers asthma.

"Today's enforcement actions are a victory for human health," said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA's regional administrator.

Ampersand was fined $328,000 for its Chowchilla plant and $492,000 for the Merced County operation.

The EPA and the district will split the penalty, which is considered a rarity. EPA and local districts don't often work together on enforcement actions, though a Wisconsin Clean Air Act settlement highlighted parallel coordination elsewhere.

EPA's share of the money will go to the U.S. Treasury. The Valley air district uses such penalties to fund programs helping residents buy electric lawn mowers or cleaner-burning wood stoves.

Ampersand also was required to pay an extra $15,000 to the Valley air district for separate violations of district rules, including requirements for emissions control plans.

Ampersand bought and refurbished the two biomass plants in 2007 and 2008, federal air officials said, while a failed experimental plant elsewhere was mothballed after costing millions.

The operations had been shut down during the 1990s, according to the Valley air district.

Aside from nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide, the two plants violated limits for sulfur dioxide, and cases of excess soot emissions at other utilities illustrate broader concerns. The two plants also failed to perform timely testing to measure emissions, EPA said.

Related News

Utilities see benefits in energy storage, even without mandates

Utility Battery Storage Rankings measure grid-connected capacity, not ownership, highlighting MW, MWh, and watts per…
View more

Alberta set to retire coal power by 2023, ahead of 2030 provincial deadline

Alberta coal phaseout accelerates as utilities convert to natural gas, cutting emissions under TIER regulations…
View more

Alberta Proposes Electricity Market Changes

Alberta Electricity Market Reforms aim to boost grid reliability and efficiency through a day-ahead market,…
View more

Ontario confronts reality of being short of electricity in the coming years

Ontario electricity shortage is looming, RBC and IESO warn, as EV electrification surges, Pickering nuclear…
View more

New Hydro One CEO aims to repair relationship with Ontario government — and investors

Hydro One CEO Mark Poweska aims to rebuild ties with Ontario's provincial government, investors, and…
View more

NTPC bags order to supply 300 MW electricity to Bangladesh

NTPC Bangladesh Power Supply Tender sees NVVN win 300 MW, long-term cross-border electricity trade to…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified