NEMA advocates state-by-state study on demand response

subscribe

In response to a report released by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) is advocating the use of the state-by-state study as a guide for achieving maximum cost-effective demand response.

The National Assessment of Demand Response Potential was authorized by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. The report finds that with full demand-response participation, the U.S. can level out peak-capacity requirements through 2019, nearly eliminating the need for new power plants.

The peak-shifting behavior is based primarily on the prevalence of central air conditioner controls along with the use of advanced meters and communicating thermostats.

“The FERC report shows the potential of how our nation can address many energy goals through the smart use of energy management technologies,” said NEMA President and CEO Evan R. Gaddis.

In addition to existing technologies, this report identifies future technological trends that can continue to reduce peak load, including Smart Grid capable appliances, photovoltaic panels, and plug-in electric vehicles. Because these newer technologies have a short track record, their demand-response potential was not quantified. To speed adoption of current and future technologies, regulators can include demand-response technologies in building codes and increase the use of dynamic, as opposed to fixed, electricity rates. The report, however, does quantify the current status and future trends of demand response in each state.

“NEMA encourages state regulatory commissions and companies to use the state-by-state program as a guide for achieving the maximum level of cost-effective demand response in each state,” said Gaddis.

Related News

bitcoin electricity

The Great Debate About Bitcoin's Huge Appetite For Electricity Determining Its Future

NEW YORK - There is a great debate underway about the electricity required to process Bitcoin transactions. The debate is significant, the stakes are high, the views are diverse, and there are smart people on both sides. Bitcoin generates a lot of emotion, thereby producing too much heat and not enough light. In this post, I explain the importance of identifying the key issues in the debate, and of understanding the nature and extent of disagreement about how much electrical energy Bitcoin consumes.

Consider the background against which the debate is taking place. Because of its unstable price, Bitcoin cannot serve…

READ MORE
oil graph

New England Is Burning the Most Oil for Electricity Since 2018

READ MORE

Opp Leader calls for electricity market overhaul to favor consumers over generators

READ MORE

ev connector

Electricity Grids Can Handle Electric Vehicles Easily - They Just Need Proper Management

READ MORE

"Knowledge Gap" Is Contributing To On-the-job Electrical Injuries

READ MORE