Ontario closes 4 more coal units

Under attack for soaring hydro bills, the Ontario government struck back by announcing the shutdown of four more coal-fired energy generating units.

Speaking from the Ontario Lung Association headquarters in Toronto, Energy Minister Brad Duguid said two of eight coal-fired units at the Nanticoke station and two of four at the Lambton plant have closed. Shutting them down is the pollution-clearing equivalent of removing up to 2 million cars from the road.

The Ontario government hopes to phase out all coal-fired plants by 2014, replacing that capacity with wind power and other clean energy sources.

“By closing these units down four years ahead of schedule, we’ll actually save about $200 million between now and 2014,” Duguid said. About 200 jobs will be lost.

The Liberals have been criticized for allowing energy costs to soar due to time-of-use rates, an 8 percentage point addition to hydro bills with the new HST and its spending of billions of dollars on green energy pursuits.

“Closing down these four units is a symbol to all Ontarians we are serious about doing this,” Duguid said.

“We will be one of the few jurisdictions in the world to have accomplished this and the result will be cleaner air for all Ontarians.”

By 2014, 19 coal units at five Ontario Power Generation plants will have stopped burning coal as fuel, according to the energy ministry. Of the 19, eight have already shut down, including four units at MississaugaÂ’s Lakeview Generating Station, two at Nanticoke Generating Station near Simcoe and two at the Lambton Generating Station outside Sarnia.

Environmental groups and doctors praised the move, saying pollution spewed by coal-fired stations is partially responsible for certain lung diseases and asthma problems in children.

No other jurisdiction is going as far as Ontario to help clean the air, said Gideon Forman, executive director of Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.

“This is a huge step. It has North American-wide implications,” he said. “When they close all the coal plants in 2014, it will be the largest single green house gas reduction project in North America.”

Coal plants produce carcinogens, smog, greenhouse gases and acid rain, Forman said, not to mention that the pollution causes 120,000 illnesses a year in Ontario alone.

“The health costs are about $3 billion a year in Ontario. As we phase out coal, we’ll see savings,” he told the Star.

There is a lot of “squawking” from opposition parties about renewable energy but the reality is that to get rid of coal improves the health of Ontarians, said Rick Smith, the executive director of Environmental Defence.

The NDP and Progressive Conservatives are being “disingenuous with their arguments about costs,” Smith said. Factor in the human cost and renewable energy is a bargain, he said.

Conservative MPP Steve Clark Leeds-Grenville said everyone agrees the environment is important but demand for energy has fallen with the loss of 300,000 provincial manufacturing jobs.

“That is the real reason behind the coal closures,” Clark said.

People are angry about rising hydro costs, he added. “Over the next five years people are going to be paying another over $700 a year more for energy.”

NDP MPP Peter Tabuns Toronto-Danforth pointed out the Liberals promised in 2003 to close coal plants by 2007.

“If they would have listened to advice of environmentalists and the NDP a number of years ago, they’d be on the verge of shutting down Lambton and Nanticoke now.”

After Duguid made the good news announcement, noted U.S. environmental crusader Erin Brockovich addressed a crowd in Oakville regarding the controversial plan to build a 900-megawatt natural gas power plant close to 16 schools and 11,000 homes.

When asked by reporters if the Liberals have changed their mind on the location of the plant, Duguid said he is “continuing to look at options.”

“We are continuing to listen to the views of those residents and we’ll continue to do that as we take a look at the future of that particular plant,” he said. “We are always a government that is going to listen to Ontarians.”

Related News

electric vehicle

Why subsidies for electric cars are a bad idea for Canada

TORONTO - Bad ideas sometimes look better, and sell better, than good ones. Not always, or else Canada wouldn’t be the mostly well-run place that it is. But sometimes politicians embrace a less-than-best policy – because its attractive appearance may make it more likely to win the popularity contest, right now, even though it will fail in the long run.

The most seasoned political advisers know it. Pollsters too. Voters, in contrast, don’t know what they don’t know, which is why bad policy often triumphs. At first glance, the wrong sometimes looks like it must be right, while better and…

READ MORE
powerlines

How utilities are using AI to adapt to electricity demands

READ MORE

oyster creek nuclear plant

Cost of US nuclear generation at ten-year low

READ MORE

vancouver skyline at night

Electricity use actually increased during 2018 Earth Hour, BC Hydro

READ MORE

pumped stprage

Hydroelectricity Under Pumped Storage Capacity

READ MORE