Power plant clashes with aquifer


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Minnesota groundwater permit threshold debated as DNR, lawmakers, and L.S. Power weigh aquifer protections, water management, and permits tied to the Mt. Simon/Hinckley and Jordan aquifers, with 100 million gallons as a potential cutoff.

 

What You Need to Know

Caps new high-use permits to withdrawals over 100 million gallons per year, aimed at safeguarding Minnesota aquifers.

  • DNR suggested a 100 million gallon annual threshold
  • Olseen's bill sought metro-style protections statewide
  • Mt. Simon/Hinckley aquifer faces heavy permitted use
  • Jordan aquifer preferred in much of the metro

 

A bill to protect the 1,000-year-old water of the Mt. Simon/Hinckley aquifer — a layer of underground water extending from Duluth across eastern Minnesota — has been temporarily set aside.

 

Sen. Rick Olseen, DFL-Harris, is carrying the legislation, an offshoot of the debate surrounding the L.S. Power gas-fired electric generating power plant proposal for Lent Township in Chisago County, he explained.

“Boy oh boy, you start talking about their water — it gets passionate very quickly,” said Olseen of area residents nearby.

The power plant has been an intense issue, Olseen explained.

Although the plant, by agreement, will not use groundwater — actually purchase “grey” wastewater for usage — some people remain skeptical, Olseen explained.

In his bill, Olseen attempted to extend protections afforded groundwater in the seven-county metro area across the Mt. Simon/Hinckley aquifer.

That would limit new water use permits to municipalities.

But Department of Natural Resources (DNR) water management officials found the bill too restrictive.

Appearing before the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee, where Xcel's nuclear storage bid also drew attention recently, DNR Division of Waters Director Kent Lokkesmoe suggested a 100-million gallon of a year permit threshold be incorporated into the bill.

That is, water permits would be restricted for uses of more than 100 million gallons of water a year.

In giving examples, Lokkesmoe noted that an ethanol plant uses about 400 million gallons of water a year, while an agricultural irrigation system may use about 40 million gallons.

Within much of the metro the Jordan aquifer, which lies atop of the Mt. Simon/Hinckley, is the aquifer of choice as it’s the easiest to reach, Lokkesmoe explained.

But in other areas, the Mt. Simon/Hinckley aquifer is the first aquifer well drillers hit.

There are some 264 water permits across the state for the Mt. Simon/Hinckley aquifer, according to the DNR.

The City of Fridley draws some 2.4 billion gallons of water a year from it. “We’re a thirsty lot,” quipped Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Satveer Chaudhary, of resident of Fridley.

But a number of concerns were expressed about Olseen’s bill, reflecting how a wood-burning plant became embroiled in politics elsewhere lately.

Why a 100-million gallon a year threshold? lawmakers asked.

A League of Minnesota Cities officials said Olseen’s bill, as currently proposed, would loosen groundwater protection within the seven-county metro area.

Chaudhary tabled the legislation, suggesting Olseen work on it as the state advances Minnesota Power's emission plan in parallel today.

Olseen questions whether L.S. Power would ever attempt to use groundwater in its plant operation.

Were it to do that, it would lose tax exemptions, Olseen noted.

But Olseen intends to bring his bill back.

Related News

Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles

Canada EV Tariffs weigh protectionism, import duties, and trade policy against affordable electric vehicles, climate…
View more

The Haves and Have-Nots of Electricity in California

California Public Safety Power Shutoffs highlight wildfire prevention as PG&E outages disrupt schools, businesses, and…
View more

Fuel Cell Electric Buses Coming to Mississauga

Mississauga Fuel Cell Electric Buses advance zero-emission public transit, leveraging hydrogen fuel cells, green hydrogen…
View more

The crisis in numbers: How COVID-19 has reshaped Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan COVID-19 economic impact: real-time data shows drops in electricity demand, oil well licensing, traffic…
View more

Cryptocurrency firm in Plattsburgh fights $1 million electric charge

Coinmint Plattsburgh Dispute spotlights cryptocurrency mining, hydropower electricity rates, a $1M security deposit, Public Service…
View more

Power industry may ask staff to live on site as Coronavirus outbreak worsens

Power plant staff sequestration isolates essential operators on-site at plants and control centers, safeguarding critical…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.