Companies cry foul over Samsung deal

Protective Relay Training - Basic

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

Live Online
12 hours Instructor-led
Group Training Available

Regular Price:

$699

Coupon Price:

$599

Reserve Your Seat Today

Ontario-Samsung renewable energy deal outlines $7 billion incentives, feed-in-tariff rates, wind and solar manufacturing, grid access priorities, and subsidies under Ontario's Green Energy Act, sparking competition concerns among developers, manufacturers, and domestic renewable industry stakeholders.

The Important Points

A $7B pact granting incentives, FIT rates, and grid priority to Samsung-KEPCO projects and manufacturing in Ontario.

$437M incentives for four Ontario manufacturing plants
2,500 MW wind and solar projects receive FIT rates
Priority transmission grid access raises fairness issues
Local firms decry opaque, one-off subsidy negotiation
Concerns over R&D impact and level playing field

Canadian-based green power firms say the lucrative deal Ontario has signed with Samsung Group will give the South Korean company an unfair advantage in the key Ontario renewable energy market.

Under the $7-billion agreement with Samsung and Korea Electric Power Corp., the Ontario government will pay $437-million in incentives if the consortium completes four manufacturing plants in the province. These plants will make wind-turbine towers and blades, and solar inverters and modules.

In addition, Samsung's planned 2,500 megawatts of wind and solar power projects will get the same high electricity rates the province is paying to anyone who generates solar or wind power under Ontario's feed-in-tariff incentives program in its Green Energy Act.

Many developers and manufacturers, including solar energy giants with plans to expand in Ontario, expressed shock and surprise that Samsung is receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in extra incentives they can't get.

While the provincial government has said it wants to build a domestic green-energy industry, promising a jolt for declining towns across Ontario, this private deal with a foreign entity has raised concerns among Canadian firms who expected a level playing field.

"It basically gives an unfair competitive advantage to Samsung because they have decided to be both a manufacturer and a developer, where as other manufacturers who are looking at Ontario and planning on making substantial investments and creating jobs... won't get the same benefits," said Kerry Adler, chief executive officer of solar farm developer SkyPower Corp.

The deal appears to discriminate against existing players such as SkyPower, Mr. Adler said. "We intend to buy [solar] panels from Canadian manufacturers, so shouldn't [we] also be receiving some form of economic [bonus] if we buy from Ontario? What's the difference? The only difference is that Samsung is doing both, when there is a whole community of manufacturers who just manufacture and a whole community of developers who just develop."

One Canadian firm that is considering setting up shop in Ontario is Bromont-Que.-based wind-turbine manufacturer AAER Inc. Chief financial officer Eric Phaneuf said he was surprised by the way Ontario's private deal with Samsung was negotiated, and suggested it isn't consistent with the "openness and transparency" of the program in place for other players.

Michael Carten, executive chairman of Calgary-based solar inverter maker Sustainable Energy Technologies Ltd., said he too is puzzled by the huge incentive being offered only to Samsung.

The Korean company is unlikely to be conducting any research and development in Canada, Mr. Carten said, so it may contribute less to the province's economic development than some local players who aren't getting an extra subsidy. "It mystifies me why it is a one-off deal."

Last October, his company announced it will build inverters for the North American market in Ontario, partly because it expects a surge in demand due to the local content requirements and related solar rules in the province's feed-in-tariff program. Now, Mr. Carten said he intends to write to provincial official to ask for the same kind of financial incentives Samsung is getting. "I would hope that the province would say to[us]: 'Yeah, you too.'"

Mr. Carten, like many other green-energy players, is also concerned Ontario is giving the Samsung group priority access to the electrical transmission grid in the province.

Limited capacity in the grid is a bottleneck slowing some renewable energy projects. "I'm not sure I go along with carving up access to the grid when there is not enough access to go around," Mr. Carten said. "I don't know how you explain this to other guys."

Tim Stephure, an analyst at Emerging Energy Research in Cambridge, Mass., said the Samsung deal appears to encourage companies to negotiate individual deals with the Ontario government, rather than play by the transparent rules set out in the Green Energy Act.

"[The Samsung deal] might provide the industry with a bit of a sugar high in the near term, but it doesn't provide a lot of confidence in the province... to administer the program it designed," he said.

Mr. Stephure also questioned Ontario's ability to compete with incentives put in place by the Obama administration to encourage green jobs in the United States, noting Germany's reaction to Ontario's solar policy as another point of comparison. Those programs are more transparent and even-handed, he said, and actually add up to higher subsidies than what is being given to Samsung.