Saskatchewan scraps nuclear power plan


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today
The Canadian province of Saskatchewan, a top uranium-producing region, said it will not go ahead with construction of Western Canada's first nuclear power plant due to uncertainty about costs.

However, the government left the door open to future development and raised the possibility of co-operation with the neighboring Prairie provinces of Alberta and Manitoba.

The decision comes as rising upfront costs appear to be becoming a deterrent for construction of some reactors, a point of concern for a nuclear industry that has enjoyed a renaissance in recent years.

Construction of a 3,000 megawatt nuclear plant in Saskatchewan had been recommended by a government advisory panel earlier this year, while nuclear generating company Bruce Power said in a 2008 study that a 1,000 megawatt reactor would be a good fit for the province's energy needs.

The province currently consumes 3,600 megawatts annually, and is expected to have to generate another 1,200 to 1,750 megawatts for domestic use by 2020, due in part to the need to decommission some of its coal-fired plants.

"We carefully evaluated (Bruce Power's) initial plans, however uncertainty around long-term costs to consumers remain a lingering concern," provincial Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd said.

He said the large scale of the proposed plant requires a regional approach that would ideally involve Alberta and Manitoba.

Alberta, home to energy-hungry oil sands developments, said this week it would examine the merits of proposals to build nuclear power plants on a case-by-case basis.

Nuclear power has enjoyed a global renaissance in recent years, helped by soaring oil prices and tightening regulations on greenhouse gas emissions associated with coal-fired generation.

However, Saskatchewan is not the first region to balk at the multibillion-dollar up-front costs to build reactors.

The province of Ontario, home to most of the country's nuclear stations, recently shelved plans to build two new reactors, citing high costs.

Ray Goldie, a uranium equities analyst at Salman Partners, said the continuing rise of costs could be cause for concern on other nuclear projects.

"It's certainly a possibility that existing (projects) under way could be scaled back because of cost pressures," he said.

The right-leaning Saskatchewan Party government, led by Premier Brad Wall, has pushed for further nuclear development to create more revenue and jobs from the province's rich uranium reserves.

In its statement the government said it would continue to push uranium exploration and mining and direct provincial utility SaskPower to continue looking at nuclear power as an option for additional generation capacity in the long term beyond 2020.

"We're still optimistic that Saskatchewan sees a role in the future for nuclear energy," said John Peevers, a spokesman for Bruce Power, which is part-owned by Saskatchewan-based uranium miner Cameco and pipeline company TransCanada Corp. The company operates the eight-reactor Bruce nuclear station on Lake Huron, northwest of Toronto, which has a generating capacity of more than 7,200 MW.

Saskatchewan's decision comes as the Canadian government said it is looking to sell its Candu commercial nuclear division, which is operated by government-owned Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, saying it needs outside investors to boost its chances for growth and help cut costs to taxpayers.

Candu heavy-water technology represents almost 10 percent of reactor capacity around the globe, including all of Canada's installed nuclear capacity.

Related News

Germany considers U-turn on nuclear phaseout

Germany Nuclear Power Extension debated as Olaf Scholz weighs energy crisis, gas shortages from Russia,…
View more

'Unbelievably dangerous': NB Power sounds alarm on copper theft after vandalism, deaths

NB Power copper thefts highlight risks at high-voltage substations, with vandalism, fatalities, infrastructure damage, ratepayer…
View more

Global: Nuclear power: what the ‘green industrial revolution’ means for the next three waves of reactors

UK Nuclear Energy Ten Point Plan outlines support for large reactors, SMRs, and AMRs, funding…
View more

Britons could save on soaring bills as ministers plan to end link between gas and electricity prices

UK Electricity-Gas Price Decoupling aims to reform wholesale electricity pricing under the Energy Security Bill,…
View more

Energy-insecure households in the U.S. pay 27% more for electricity than others

Community Solar for Low-Income Homes expands energy equity by delivering renewable energy access, predictable bill…
View more

94,000 lose electricity in LA area after fire at station

Los Angeles Power Station Fire prompts LADWP to shut a Northridge/Reseda substation, causing a San…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.