Why not bury power lines?

subscribe

With each major ice storm in Oklahoma, the question seems to resurface: Why not bury the power lines?

The issue has come up again as electricity trickles back on in southwestern Oklahoma, a week after a winter storm left thousands in the region without power. More than 30,000 customers remained without electricity February 4, although utility spokesmen said progress was being made in restoring service.

To complicate matters, another winter storm began moving into the state and forecasters were predicting the possibility of yet another one.

Underground power lines could mean fewer outages during such winter storms. The problem is the cost of burying them, according to Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., Public Service Co. of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives.

Burying all the transmission lines in Oklahoma would cost an estimated $27 billion, raising customers' bills as much as $270 a month for 30 years, according to a 2008 report by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission's Public Utility Division after an ice storm knocked out power to a wide swath of the state. Transmission lines are high-voltage lines that carry large quantities of power, often over long distances.

The report estimated the cost of putting underground all the distribution lines, which usually carry lower voltages and are used to distribute power in urban and rural areas, was set at $30.5 billion.

"You have to do those things that made good economic sense," OG&E spokesman Brian Alford said. "You have to look at the cost-benefit of putting lines underground."

OG&E has focused more on trimming back trees near power lines and other ways of making its system more resistant to outages instead of putting the lines underground, Alford said — although the company is not opposed to burying lines.

PSO began burying its distribution lines in 2005 but discontinued it in 2009 because of the economic climate, spokesman Stan Whiteford said. He said about 100 miles of PSO's 20,000 miles of distribution lines in Oklahoma were buried during that time.

Whiteford said PSO hopes to resume the program — for which it can recoup its costs from customers — in the future.

Burying transmission lines is impractical, Corporation Commission spokesman Matt Skinner said, and those lines are what caused the major problems in the last storm. He said the commission has supported distribution line burial, "but the problem is who pays for it and how much."

Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives spokesman Sid Sperry said member rural electric cooperatives reported about 20,000 outages on the morning after the storm. He said it could take until February 11 before power is fully restored in some areas.

Related News

solar power graph

Solar Becomes #3 Renewable Electricity Source In USA

WASHINGTON - Electricity generation from solar resources in the United States reached 77 million megawatthours (MWh) in 2017, surpassing for the first time annual generation from biomass resources, which generated 64 million MWh in 2017. Among renewable sources, only hydro and wind generated more electricity in 2017, at 300 million MWh and 254 million MWh, respectively. Biomass generating capacity has remained relatively unchanged in recent years, while solar generating capacity has consistently grown.

Annual growth in solar generation often lags annual capacity additions because generating capacity tends to be added late in the year. For example, in 2016, 29% of total…

READ MORE
electricity raindrops

The Cool Way Scientists Turned Falling Raindrops Into Electricity

READ MORE

solar power

States have big hopes for renewable energy. Get ready to pay for it.

READ MORE

chinese nuclear power plant

Is nuclear power really in decline?

READ MORE

thermostat

B.C. electricity demand hits an all-time high

READ MORE