Utilities fight EPA coal-ash regulation


NFPA 70E Training - 2027 Edition - Arc Flash and Electrical Safety Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

EPA Coal Ash Hazardous Waste Regulation faces OMB review after the TVA Kingston spill; EPA weighs hazardous designation, financial assurance, and cleanup. Utilities warn of costs, electricity rates, and impacts on cement and wallboard markets.

 

Story Summary

EPA may label coal ash hazardous waste; OMB review could affect utility costs, cleanup funding, and reuse in cement.

  • EPA considers coal ash hazardous under federal rules
  • OMB meets industry on proposed EPA coal byproduct rules
  • TVA Kingston spill triggers federal scrutiny and reforms
  • Utilities warn of billions in costs and higher rates
  • Reuse in cement and wallboard could be jeopardized

 

There may be trouble ahead for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule to regulate coal-ash from power plants, as environmental groups report a number of industry meetings on the coal-ash issue within the Obama Administration, indicating that utilities and other companies are gaining a lobbying advantage in the White House, reports The Wall Street Journal.

 

In October last year, the EPA announced it was considering the regulation of coal ash as toxic waste, several months after a coal ash spill of 1.1 billion gallons of coal ash slurry at the Kingston power plant operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The toxins in coal ash include arsenic, mercury and selenium.

In a separate action, EPA also has identified three industries — including coal products manufacturing (including refineries and not coal mines), chemical manufacturing, petroleum and the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry — that could face financial assurance requirements to ensure that the owners or operators of the facilities, not taxpayers, will be responsible for cleanups.

Cass Sunstein, Obama’s regulatory czar, who directs the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs within the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has held nearly 20 meetings with industry groups since October to discuss the potential impact of proposed EPA rules amid an EPA delay on coal ash rules to treat coal ash and other coal byproducts as hazardous waste, according to White House records, reports The Wall Street Journal.

Watchdog groups told The Wall Street Journal it is unusual for the OMB to be involved so early in the process, and TVA watchdog claims echo those concerns, particularly since the EPA has not published its proposed new regulations for coal ash, according to the article.

Utility companies argue that a federal hazardous-waste ruling would result in significant logistical challenges and potentially billions of dollars in new costs, while other industries believe the ruling could jeopardize the use of coal ash in construction materials such as cement mix and wallboard, reports The Wall Street Journal.

The Electric Power Research Institute, a power-industry research organization, told OMB that utilities could lose between $5 billion to $10 billion of revenue annually if they couldn’t sell coal combustion byproducts to industry, along with the potential shut down of 250 to 350 coal units even as new coal plants are slated for construction, and increased electricity costs, reports The Wall Street Journal.

In response, environmentalists and environmental groups say these estimates are a scare tactic intended to weaken the proposed rule, according to the article.

 

Related News

Related News

Longer, more frequent outages afflict the U.S. power grid as states fail to prepare for climate change

Power Grid Climate Resilience demands storm hardening, underground power lines, microgrids, batteries, and renewable energy…
View more

IEA praises Modi govt for taking electricity to every village; calls India 'star performer'

India Village Electrification hailed by the IEA in World Energy Outlook 2018 showcases rapid energy…
View more

Berlin Geothermal Plant in El Salvador Set to Launch This Year

El Salvador Geothermal Expansion boosts renewable energy with a 7 MW Berlin binary ORC plant,…
View more

Duke Energy Florida to build its largest battery storage projects yet

Duke Energy Florida battery storage will add 22 MW across Trenton, Cape San Blas and…
View more

Green hydrogen, green energy: inside Brazil's $5.4bn green hydrogen plant

Enegix Base One Green Hydrogen Plant will produce renewable hydrogen via electrolysis in Ceara, Brazil,…
View more

EPA Policy to limit telework emerges during pandemic

EPA Telework Policy restricts remote work, balancing work-from-home guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic with flexible…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.