Quebec report seeks to divert water, generate power

MONTREAL, QUEBEC - Quebec could raise up to $9.5 billion (US $8.5 billion) a year by reversing the flow of three northern rivers to generate power and export water to the United States, according to a recently released report.

The Montreal Economic Institute said Quebec could divert floodwaters from the three rivers in the spring, pumping the excess water higher, and then letting it flow south through the Ottawa River to the St. Lawrence.

The rivers currently flow into James Bay in northern Canada and then into Hudson Bay, a 316,000 sq mi (818,000 sq km) expanse of water that's bigger than Chile.

The report said that diverting the floodwater from north to south would boost levels on the St Lawrence River and let U.S. and Canadian authorities increase their use of fresh water from the Great Lakes without any risk to St Lawrence itself, a major international seaway.

"The revenue generated by exporting freshwater would be the result of complex negotiations between state, provincial and federal governments," said the report, compiled by former hydro-electric power engineer Pierre Gingras.

"Whatever the outcome of negotiations, and given the probable increase in the value of water in the coming years, this revenue from the sale of water would contribute significantly to the financial health of the Quebec government and the general prosperity of Quebecers."

The idea of bulk water exports from Canada has always been controversial, for political, environmental and security reasons.

But Gingras said the scheme could net the French-speaking province some $7.5 billion a year, assuming the extra water supplied some 150 million people who paid a "very reasonable" $50 a year for the water.

The project, which Gingras calls Northern Waters, would also build 25 hydro-electric plants and dams along the Ottawa River, generating electricity worth $2 billion a year.

He put the cost of the project at some $15 billion and said it could be completed by 2022. "It should be a very profitable project for Quebec," he said.

But environmental group Great Lakes United said a project like Northern Waters could be devastating to the environment.

"The seasonal runoff is not surplus water. The rising and lowering of the rivers and lakes is critical to protecting the marsh which is home to so much wildlife," said program director John Jackson.

He said the project was contrary to legislation that forbids the bulk export of Canadian water from any of the five major basins, including the Hudson Bay Basin.

"There would be huge legal fights. There is no way you could win those battles," said Jackson.

The report said the environmental impact would be relatively small because the project would only capture "seasonal surplus waters".

Related News

norwegian energy

Are Norwegian energy firms ‘best in class’ for environmental management?

OSLO - By Tom Baxter

The recent Energy Voice article from the Equinor chairman concerning the Mariner project heralding a ‘significant point of reference’ for growth highlighted the energy efficiency achievements associated with the platform.

I view energy efficiency as a key enabler to net zero and it is a topic I have been involved with for many years.

As part of my energy efficiency work, I investigated Norwegian practices and compared them with the UK.

There were many differences, here are three;


1. Power for offshore installations is usually supplied from gas turbines burning fuel from the oil and gas processing plant and…

READ MORE
nb ev charging network planned

NB Power launches public charging network for EVs

READ MORE

manhattan lights

Electricity Demand In The Time Of COVID-19

READ MORE

Abengoa, Acciona to start work on 110MW Cerro Dominador CSP plant in Chile

READ MORE

eu smart grid

EU Smart Meters Spur Growth in the Customer Analytics Market

READ MORE