South Carolina board to hear challenge of Duke's dams permit

subscribe

Two conservation groups have won their challenge as South Carolina's environmental board agreed to hear their opposition to Duke Energy's request for a water quality permit so it can re-license five dams along one of the state's rivers.

The Department of Heath and Environmental Control Board agreed to hear the challenge from American Rivers and the Coastal Conservation League at its next meeting July 9.

The environmental groups opposed DHEC offering Duke the water quality permit the company needs because they say the utility hasn't done enough to make sure the 225-long Catawba and Wateree rivers in North and South Carolina remain safe for wildlife and drinking water.

Duke Energy officials are asking federal officials to allow them to continue to operate 11 hydroelectric dams along the rivers for the next 50 years, but the utility will need water quality permits from both Carolinas before the dams are relicensed.

North Carolina has already issued permits for the six dams in that state, Duke spokesman Andy Thompson said.

The river system provides drinking water and electricity for at least 1 million people, according to the Charlotte, N.C., utility.

Duke is preparing for next month's hearing and will give DHEC whatever information it needs to make a decision.

"We recognized there would be this possibility," Thompson said. "We certainly feel we have met all of the requirements."

The environmental groups don't think Duke has done enough to ensure the river will remain clean enough for drinking water and enough water flowing through to make sure fish and wildlife can thrive.

They also said the permit conflicts with an ongoing lawsuit regarding equitable use of the river. In 2007, South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster sued to stop North Carolina from draining the Catawba River basin. Under the permit, South Carolina is guaranteed about 25 percent of the water that flows from North Carolina.

A special master appointed to hear the case has allowed several interveners — including Duke Energy and the city of Charlotte — to enter the case, a decision McMaster has contested. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that South Carolina may present arguments why those parties should stay out of the dispute over the watershed, but that hearing has not been held.

Related News

Feds to study using electricity to 'reduce or eliminate' fossil fuels

OTTAWA - The federal government wants to spend up to $300,000 on a study aimed at understanding whether existing electrical technologies can “reduce or eliminate” fossil fuels used for virtually every purpose other than generating electricity.

The proposal has caused consternation within the Saskatchewan government, which has spent months attacking federal policies it believes will harm the Western Canadian energy sector without meaningfully addressing climate change.

Procurement documents indicate the “Electrification Potential Study for Canada” will provide “strategic guidance on the need to pursue both electric and non-electric energy research and development to enable deep decarbonisation scenarios.”

“It is critical that (Natural Resources…

READ MORE
nevada solar panels

Nevada on track to reach RPS mandate of 50% renewable electricity by 2030: report

READ MORE

ofgem proposal

Two new electricity interconnectors planned for UK

READ MORE

ontario nuclear plant

Analysis: Why is Ontario’s electricity about to get dirtier?

READ MORE

fortis BC logo

Relief for power bills in B.C. offered to only part of province

READ MORE