Noranda fighting rate increases


CSA Z462 Arc Flash Training – Electrical Safety Compliance Course

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$249
Coupon Price:
$199
Reserve Your Seat Today

Noranda Ameren Rate Dispute centers on electricity rates before the Missouri Public Service Commission, affecting an aluminum smelter paying 3.8 cents per kilowatt-hour, amid industrial power hikes, consumer protection debates, and cleanup, nuclear-plant cost pressures.

 

Key Information

Missouri dispute over industrial power rates, balancing Noranda smelter costs with Ameren hikes and PSC review.

  • Noranda pays about 3.8 cents per kilowatt-hour
  • Public counsel says rates are $26M too low
  • Ameren seeks hikes for emissions cleanup, nuclear
  • Smelter uses power like the city of Springfield
  • Proposed rebates if plant closes to protect consumers

 

Noranda Aluminum Inc., one of the state's largest power users and an economic engine in Southeast Missouri, says its electric rates are unfairly high and that increases in those rates threaten its viability.

 

However, a study from the Missouri Office of Public Counsel showed that Noranda pays less than its fair share and that the company's current rates are $26 million too low, according to The St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Franklin, Tennessee-based Noranda has challenged every rate increase that Ameren Corp. has sought from the state's Public Service Commission. Noranda's chief executive, Kip Smith, now warns that continued hikes, linked to a funding debate over Ameren's nuclear plans, threaten the smelter, which consumes as much power as the city of Springfield.

Since becoming an Ameren customer in 2005, the company's electric bill has risen steadily — to $150 million annually. Noranda would pay $15 million more under a proposed rate increase. More hikes may follow, as Ameren faces billions of dollars in costs to clean up coal emissions and possibly build a second nuclear plant in Missouri.

Business leaders and elected officials in Southeast Missouri say the region would be crippled if it lost the smelter, which generates millions of dollars in wages and revenue. But they say that's unlikely to happen.

"They're the biggest employer in the Bootheel, and they've got a huge investment out there," said Sam L. Hunter III, president of the Bank of New Madrid. "They're not just going to pick up and leave that."

In a presentation to the Missouri Chamber of Commerce in Jefferson City, Smith said the issue of electric increases, given the nuclear price tag utilities face, was a "moment of truth."

Noranda's power bills have always been a key concern because of the volume of electricity required to produce molten aluminum.

While the company pays less for electricity than any other Ameren customer — about 3.8 cents per kilowatt-hour — its rate is third-highest among 10 U.S. aluminum smelters in operation today, even after AmerenUE suspended second-reactor plans years earlier, according to data it provided to the Public Service Commission.

Noranda pays less than other Ameren customers because it costs less to supply the plant with electricity, though significant debate remains over how much less its rates should be.

Missouri's public counsel, Lewis Mills III, concluded in a study that Noranda's rates are currently $26 million too low — even before the Public Service Commission decides whether Ameren deserves an increase, and after regulators warned lawmakers on a power plant bill — and that smaller businesses pay too much.

Rep. Jay Barnes, R-Jefferson City, cited the analysis in introducing recent legislation, as lawmakers sought to change funding requirements for power plants, to require Noranda to rebate millions of dollars to residential electric customers in Missouri if it closed the smelter and left Missouri.

At the Capitol, senators are weighing a bill to pay for power plants as part of the broader energy debate.

Barnes doesn't mind Noranda paying the lowest rate in the state, but believes consumers should be protected if the company ever leaves.

"They are an important employer in Southeast Missouri," he said. "That's why they're getting this benefit."

 

Related News

Related News

European gas prices fall to pre-Ukraine war level

European Gas Prices hit pre-invasion lows as LNG inflows, EU storage gains, and softer oil…
View more

New England Is Burning the Most Oil for Electricity Since 2018

New England oil-fired generation surges as ISO New England manages a cold snap, dual-fuel switching,…
View more

FPL Proposes Significant Rate Hikes Over Four Years

FPL Rate Increase Proposal 2026-2029 outlines $9B base-rate hikes as Florida grows, citing residential demand,…
View more

Toshiba, Tohoku Electric Power and Iwatani start development of large H2 energy system

Fukushima Hydrogen Energy System leverages a 10,000 kW H2 production hub for grid balancing, demand…
View more

EDP Plans to Reject $10.9 Billion-China Three Gorges Bid

EDP Takeover Bid Rejection signals pushback on China Three Gorges' acquisition bid, as investors, shareholders,…
View more

Barakah Unit 1 reaches 100% power as it steps closer to commercial operations, due to begin early 2021

Barakah Unit 1 100 Percent Power signals the APR-1400 reactor delivering 1400MW of clean baseload…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified