Progress considers new nuke plant to meet state's energy demand


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
Progress Energy is exploring the possibility of building a new nuclear plant as the company looks at economical ways to supply North Carolina's future energy needs.

The Raleigh-based utility's top executive said he expects company officials will decide within two years what type of energy will best meet anticipated electricity demand.

But the cheapest, cleanest and wisest fuel source would be nuclear, and a natural site for a new reactor would be to expand at the company's Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant in southern Wake County, chief executive Robert McGehee said in an interview.

The company is well aware of the controversy such a decision would generate, and that many people associate nuclear plants with accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. But McGehee said public opinion could be swayed if the federal government adopted a national energy policy favoring nuclear power.

"The only long-term solution is to do what they're doing in Europe: It is to have some kind of renaissance of nuclear power in this country," McGehee said. "I think it's just a perfect environmental solution, but I know there are other opinions on this."

Four utilities, including Duke Energy in Charlotte, have taken preliminary steps toward getting approval from federal regulators to build a nuclear plant. Duke, whose service area includes Durham, will decide possibly next month whether to build a nuclear plant, and would choose a site by year's end.

Progress Energy anticipates it will need a new power plant by 2017, and it will finish plans in time to give itself a decade to undertake the project. The utility, which serves 2.9 million customers in the Carolinas and Florida, might decide to build another natural-gas plant, the most common fuel source used in the past decade.

But officials are evaluating new nuclear-plant technology that could be added at the company's 18-year-old Shearon Harris site, about 25 miles south of Raleigh.

"Talking just hypothetically - and I know there are a lot of issues here in Wake County - here's where our load is and here's where growth is," McGehee said. "Here's where we need electricity -- we need it in the Triangle area. Now, I know there are hundreds of other issues that may outweigh that, but it's a very good site, it's built for multiple reactors, and it's where the load is."

Progress Energy operates two nuclear plants in North Carolina -- the Harris plant and the 30-year-old Brunswick Nuclear Plant near Southport. The Harris plant, which began operating in 1987, was the last operating nuclear plant to receive a construction permit in this country.

Some environmental analysts predict pitched battles if Duke or Progress pursue the nuclear option in North Carolina.

"There would be a wide range of opposition tactics - everything from scientific arguments to street protests," said Jim Warren, executive director of N.C. Waste Awareness Reduction Network, or WARN.

Disposing of radioactive nuclear waste remains an impediment to a revival of nuclear power. In Europe, nuclear fuel rods are recycled and reused, but that process is illegal in the United States. Nuclear plants are temporarily storing spent fuel rods, and a controversial plan to create a permanent underground storage facility at Yucca Mountain in Nevada has been stalled for years.

McGehee said the Yucca Mountain project could be revived with offers of financial incentives to Nevada, but a permanent storage site will go nowhere without federal intervention. "Something has to change to get this thing moving," McGehee said.

Additionally, McGehee said the future of nuclear power depends on state regulators allowing utilities to recover nuclear construction costs by raising rates. Progress Energy is lobbying state and federal lawmakers to promote nuclear power.

"It's necessary to get people really building again," McGehee said.

Related News

Seven small UK energy suppliers must pay renewables fees or risk losing licence

Ofgem Renewables Obligations drive supplier payments for renewables fees, feed-in tariffs, and renewable generation, with…
View more

Alberta Ends Moratorium on Renewable Energy Projects

Alberta Ends Renewable Energy Moratorium, accelerating wind and solar deployment while prioritizing grid stability, reliability,…
View more

Medicine Hat Grant Winners to Upgrade Grid and Use AI for Energy Savings

Medicine Hat Smart Grid AI modernizes electricity distribution with automation, sensors, and demand response, enhancing…
View more

Operating record for Bruce Power as Covid-19 support Council announced

Bruce Power Life-Extension Programme advances Ontario nuclear capacity through CANDU Major Component Replacement, reliable operation…
View more

Carbon emissions fall as electricity producers move away from coal

Global Electricity Emissions Decline highlights a 2% drop as coal power falls, while wind and…
View more

Hurricane Michael by the numbers: 32 dead, 1.6 million homes, businesses without power

Hurricane Michael Statistics track catastrophic wind speed, storm surge, rainfall totals, power outages, evacuations, and…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified