Wind power and public health


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Wind Turbine Nocebo Effect describes health complaints driven by expectation, not exposure, linking anti-wind activism, infrasound fears, psychosomatic symptoms, and public health evidence across Australia, Canada, and media reports about wind energy.

 

What You Need to Know

A hypothesis that health complaints near wind farms arise from expectations and fear, not turbine exposure.

  • Study links complaints to anti-wind activism since 2009
  • 63% of 49 Australian wind farms had zero complaints
  • 68% of complaints occurred near targeted sites
  • Expectations, infrasound fears drive psychosomatic symptoms

 

Growing body of research finds wind health claims linked to power of suggestion by anti-wind groups.

 

A new clinical study out of Australia finds that so-called "wind turbine sickness" may actually be caused by the suggestion from anti-wind groups and noise protesters that turbines make people sick. The study found that 63 percent of Australia's 49 wind farms had never been the subject of any health complaint from nearby residents. It also found 68 percent of the 120 complaints that have been made came from residents living near wind farms heavily targeted by the anti-wind farm lobby, and that "the advent of anti-wind farm groups beginning to foment concerns about health from around 2009 was also strongly correlated with actual complaints being made."

Study lead Simon Chapman, professor of public health at Sydney University, has said the results suggest that health problems attributed to wind energy are a "communicated disease" – or a sickness spread by the suggestion that something is likely to make a person sick. This is caused by the "nocebo effect" – the opposite of the placebo effect – in which the belief something can cause an illness creates the perception of illness. Chapman found a much greater connection between negative attitudes toward wind turbines and reports of health effects than any "objective measures of actual exposure."

"We review all credible information on the subject of wind turbines and human health as it is made available and it is clear that the balance of scientific evidence shows that wind turbines do not have an impact on human health. These new studies are of interest because they may have relevance for Canada where the majority of operating wind farms have not been the subject of health complaints by residents but anti-wind individuals and organizations have been traveling across Ontario and across Canada suggesting that Canadians will become ill from wind turbines."

"In many cases these presentations are made long before a wind turbine has even been constructed", says Robert Hornung, president of the Canadian Wind Energy Association CanWEA. "We believe Canadians should not back down on wind turbines and base their decisions about energy on facts grounded in the best scientific evidence. The fact remains that wind energy is one of the safest forms of electricity generation for both humans and wildlife."

Similar conclusions have been drawn in other research papers released this month.

Crichton, Fiona Dodd, George Schmid, Gian Gamble, Greg Petrie, Keith J. "Can Expectations Produce Symptoms From Infrasound Associated With Wind Turbines?” Health Psychology, March 2013 states that "Results suggest psychological expectations could explain the link between wind turbine exposure and health complaints."

Reports of headaches and sleep disturbance have also been attributed to turbine vibration by some residents.

Michael Witthöft, G. James Rubin "Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields IEI-EMF", Journal of Psychosomatic Research, March 2013 concludes that "Media reports about the adverse effects of supposedly hazardous substances can increase the likelihood of experiencing symptoms following sham exposure and developing an apparent sensitivity to it."

Related News

Trump's Pledge to Scrap Offshore Wind Projects

Trump Offshore Wind Pledge signals a push for deregulation over renewable energy, challenging climate policy,…
View more

UK net zero policies: What do changes mean?

UK Net Zero Policy Delay shifts EV sales ban to 2035, eases boiler phase-outs, keeps…
View more

Warren Buffett-linked company to build $200M wind power farm in Alberta

Rattlesnake Ridge Wind Project delivers 117.6 MW in southeast Alberta for BHE Canada, a Berkshire…
View more

Canada in top 10 for hydropower jobs, but doesn't rank on other renewables

Canada Renewable Energy Jobs rank top 10 in hydropower, says IRENA, but trail in solar…
View more

Energy Department Announces 20 New Competitors for the American-Made Solar Prize

American-Made Solar Prize Round 3 accelerates DOE-backed solar innovation, empowering entrepreneurs and domestic manufacturing with…
View more

As New Zealand gets serious about climate change, can electricity replace fossil fuels in time?

New Zealand Energy Transition will electrify transport and industry with renewables, grid-scale solar, wind farms,…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Download the 2026 Electrical Training Catalog

Explore 50+ live, expert-led electrical training courses –

  • Interactive
  • Flexible
  • CEU-cerified