Faithful customer considers mailing 'underhanded'

subscribe

Susan Munck and her husband, William, have lived off Georges Creek Road between Midland and Frostburg for nearly three years since retiring and moving from Kansas. The couple chose the site because of its convenient location with family in Carroll County and elsewhere in the region.

In May 2005, Susan put her family on an Allegheny Power payment plan that automatically deducts the total amount due on her monthly electric bill from her checking account. In her own words, she has "never, ever, ever, ever been late." Not once.

So when Munck called Allegheny Power's toll-free customer service number to let the company know she had no intention of paying the 96-cent surcharge for the next 12 months for receiving two compact fluorescent, energy-efficient light bulbs, she was understandably taken aback by the company's response.

"They threatened to turn off my power if I didn't pay this 96 cents," said Munck, one of 220,000 Allegheny Power residents to which bulbs were sent.

When Munck told the customer service representative she didn't need the bulbs - her home already is "full of those bulbs" - she was told she could give them to a neighbor but, regardless, she'd be charged for them.

"That was really underhanded what they did," Munck said. "It's unconscionable."

Delegate Kevin Kelly agreed, and has requested a bill be drafted to prevent the Maryland Public Service Commission, which approved the initiative, from endorsing such tactics in the future. He sent a mass e-mail to fellow lawmakers requesting co-sponsors of the "pro-consumer" bill.

The PSC in November authorized the power company's "Demand Response Service." In a letter dated Jan. 3 and posted on the PSC's Web site at www.psc.state.md.us, the commission "agreed with (Allegheny Power) that the Demand Response Service was one of the single most effective conservation programs that an electric utility company can implement in the near future to reduce energy demand, lower electricity prices and maintain reliable service."

The Times-News heard from a number of upset power company customers in the past two days. Cumberland residents Howard Losiewicz, Jeff Hedrick and Richard Kirchner all questioned whether it was legal to send an unsolicited item through the U.S. Postal Service and charge for it.

Related News

wyoming wind farm

Wyoming wind boost for US utility

WYOMING - US company Black Hills Energy has received regulatory approval to increase the size of its Corriedale wind farm in Wyoming to over 52MW from 40MW previously.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission approved the additional 12.5MW capacity after the Wyoming Public Service Commission determined the boost was within commission rules.

Black Hills Energy will install five additional turbines, raising the project cost to $79m from $57m.
Corriedale will be built near Cheyenne and is expected to be placed in service in late 2020.

Black Hills said that during the initial subscription period for its Renewable Ready program, applications of interest from…

READ MORE
Uk renewables

Wind and solar make more electricity than nuclear for first time in UK

READ MORE

Electric cars will challenge state power grids

READ MORE

pickering ngs

Time running out for Ontario to formally request Pickering nuclear power station extension

READ MORE

Berlin Geothermal Plant in El Salvador Set to Launch This Year

Berlin Geothermal Plant in El Salvador Set to Launch This Year

READ MORE