Canada to phase out older coal-fired power plants


NFPA 70E Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 6 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$199
Coupon Price:
$149
Reserve Your Seat Today

Canada coal power phase-out standards will force aging, high-emitting plants to retire or match natural-gas efficiency, cutting greenhouse-gas emissions, boosting clean energy, and tightening regulations beyond U.S. proposals without offsets, trading, or credits.

 

Context and Background

They are federal rules requiring old coal units to shut or meet natural-gas-level GHG rates, accelerating cleaner power.

  • Applies as units reach end of economic life
  • No trading, offsets, or credits permitted
  • Targets GHG cuts equal to 15 megatonnes
  • Aligns performance to efficient natural gas plants

 

Canada will phase out older coal-fired power plants to cut the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, Environment Minister Jim Prentice said, as it moves to make natural gas-fired plants the new clean-power standard.

 

The new standards, expected to be firmed up by early 2011, will force electricity producers to phase out older, high-emitting coal-fired plants under the Ottawa power-down directive and require newer facilities to match the lower greenhouse-gas emissions of more efficient natural-gas fired plants.

Canada has 51 coal-fired plants producing 19 of the country’s electricity and 13 of its greenhouse gas emissions. However, 33 of those plants will reach the end of their economic lives by 2025. Unless the operators make substantial investments to cut emissions from the aging facilities, they’ll be required to shut down.

“Our regulation will be very clear,” Mr. Prentice said at a press conference. “When each coal-burning unit reaches the end of its economic life, it will have to meet the new standards or close down. No trading, no offsets, no credits.”

Canada is frequently criticized by green groups for not doing enough to protect the environment and, even as Ottawa takes aim at coal power nationally, for allowing emissions of greenhouse gases to rise steadily over the last two decades.

As well, the Conservative government’s record on government-industry partnership is expected to be under scrutiny as green groups and international media descend on Toronto for the G8 and G20 summits.

Still the measures, expected to reduce emissions by 15 megatonnes — the equivalent of taking 3.2 million vehicles off the road — received some support from the green sector.

“We’re looking at this positively,” said Marlo Raynolds, executive director of the Pembina Institute, an environmental think tank. “For once the minister is heading in the right direction but the details of the regulations must actually result in a true and timely phase out of coal power in Canada.”

The move is a departure from the Canadian government’s usual practice of coordinating its emission-reduction targets with U.S. moves. The planned regulations are much stricter than current proposals for coal-fired power in the United States.

The only regulation of carbon dioxide from old-school coal plants in the United States is within the 10-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the Northeast, which aims to cut emissions from power plants by 10 by 2018.

The U.S. climate bill sponsored by Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman would put emissions caps on power plants, including ones fired by coal, where carbon capture and storage remains a challenge. It would also launch a cap and trade market in emissions credits, but the future of the legislation is uncertain as it faces stiff opposition from lawmakers from coal and oil states.

TransAlta Corp, the country’s largest operator of coal-fired plants, said it supports the new standard as long as the regulations don’t threaten the reliability of the country’s power system.

“We’re supportive of the approach,” Steve Snyder, TransAlta’s chief executive, said in an interview. “We think it raises some issues that have to be resolved, much like when Ontario ordered coal plants to cut back previously, but we think they can be.”

 

Related News

Related News

EU Plans To Double Electricity Use By 2050

European Green Deal Electrification accelerates decarbonization via renewables, electric vehicles, heat pumps, and clean industry,…
View more

Court reinstates constitutional challenge to Ontario's hefty ‘global adjustment’ electricity charge

Ontario Global Adjustment Charge faces constitutional scrutiny as a regulatory charge vs tax; Court of…
View more

BC Hydro Expects To See Electricity Usage Rise This Holiday Season

BC Hydro Holiday Electricity Usage is set to rise as energy demand increases during peak…
View more

How Bitcoin's vast energy use could burst its bubble

Bitcoin Energy Consumption drives debate on blockchain mining, proof-of-work, carbon footprint, and emissions, with CCAF…
View more

Abengoa, Acciona to start work on 110MW Cerro Dominador CSP plant in Chile

Cerro Dominador CSP Plant delivers 110MW concentrated solar power in Chile's Atacama Desert, with 10,600…
View more

Mexican president's contentious electricity overhaul defeated in Congress

Mexico Energy Reform Defeat underscores opposition unity as CFE-first rules, state regulators, and lithium nationalization…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.