EPA releases final GHG endangerment finding


NFPA 70b Training - Electrical Maintenance

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
On December 7, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its finding that greenhouse gases (GHGs), including carbon dioxide, threaten public health and welfare. This final endangerment finding was released as the United Nations Climate Change Conference opened in Copenhagen, Denmark.

The EPA issued its proposed endangerment finding on April 17, and held a 60-day public comment period that ended in June. The EPA received more than 380,000 public comments, including written comments and testimony at two public hearings in Arlington, Virginia, and Seattle, Washington, before releasing its final ruling.

The Administrator made two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA):

• Endangerment Finding – The current and projected concentrations of the six key GHGs — carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)—in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.

• Cause or Contribute Finding – The combined emissions of these six GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution that threatens public health and welfare.

According to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, “These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year when the United States government began addressing the challenge of greenhouse gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean energy reform.” In connection with the findings, the EPA published the following statement:

“GHGs are the primary driver of climate change, which can lead to hotter, longer heat waves that threaten the health of the sick, poor or elderly; increases in ground-level ozone pollution linked to asthma and other respiratory illnesses; as well as other threats to the health and welfare of Americans.”

The EPAÂ’s ruling is a response to the 2007 Supreme Court of the United States decision Massachusetts v. EPA, which found that the EPA has the statutory authority to determine whether the emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution threatening public health and welfare. While the final endangerment finding does not impose any emissions reduction requirements, it permits the EPA to finalize the proposed GHG standards for light-duty vehicles, which were proposed in a joint rulemaking with the U.S. Department of TransportationÂ’s National Highway Safety Administration in September 2009 and are expected to be finalized in March 2010.

This announcement follows a recent trend of EPA activity aimed at curtailing GHG emissions. In late September 2009, the EPA published the Final Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, which requires certain facilities and industries to report their annual GHG emissions. The EPA also announced a proposed rule that requires operating permits for large stationary sources, such as coal-burning power plants and refineries that produce 25,000 tons of GHGs or more per year.

The final endangerment decision may open the door to more EPA regulation regarding GHG emissions, placing pressure on Congress to act on pending climate change legislation. A bill passed in the House of Representatives in June 2009 prohibits the EPA from using the CAA to regulate GHG emissions, instead relying on a cap-and-trade program.

However, a similar bill in the Senate has stalled in the midst of the current health care debate, and Democratic leadership has expressed doubts that it will come to a vote before the spring. Administrator Jackson has refused to reveal whether the EPA is planning on more action before the Senate tackles this issue. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a think tank, has indicated that it intends to challenge the EPA's findings in court, and other challenges may follow.

Related News

GM president: Electric cars won't go mainstream until we fix these problems

Electric Vehicle Adoption Barriers include range anxiety, charging infrastructure, and cost parity; consumer demand, tax…
View more

BC Hydro Takes Ranchers to Court Over Hydro Line

BC Hydro is suing a ranching family in Vanderhoof, B.C. for blocking access to a…
View more

Turkish powership to generate electricity from LNG in Senegal

Karpowership LNG powership in Senegal will supply 15% of the grid, a 235 MW floating…
View more

Alberta shift from coal to cleaner energy

Alberta Coal-to-Gas Transition will retire coal units, convert plants to natural gas, boost renewables, and…
View more

Electricity blackouts spark protests in Iranian cities

Iran Power Outage Protests surge as electricity blackouts, drought, and a looming heat wave spark…
View more

Fuel Cell Electric Buses Coming to Mississauga

Mississauga Fuel Cell Electric Buses advance zero-emission public transit, leveraging hydrogen fuel cells, green hydrogen…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.