Newfoundland Power Disappointed with Pub Ruling on Pole Deal
"We are disappointed with the ruling," says Philip G. Hughes, President and Chief Executive Officer, Newfoundland Power. "This decision has a negative impact on both our customers and our shareholders."
In its ruling, PUB acknowledged the benefits of Newfoundland Power owning the 70,000 joint use poles outlined in its proposal. Although PUB agreed financial benefits from the 30,000 non-joint use poles would flow to Newfoundland Power's customers, it concluded that based on its interpretation of legislation these poles should not be included in the Newfoundland Power's regulated assets.
"Our proposal to acquire poles in Newfoundland Power's service territory focused on improving efficiency and stabilizing rates over the long-term," says Hughes.
PUB's financial consultants concluded in its report that the analysis submitted by Newfoundland Power in support of the application appeared reasonable and appropriate.
"Over the next few days we will be reviewing our options, which include applying for only the 70,000 joint use poles or appealing the PUB ruling.
Related News
Electricity Shut-Offs in a Pandemic: How COVID-19 Leads to Energy Insecurity, Burdensome Bills
WASHINGTON - I have asthma. It’s a private piece of medical information that I don’t normally share with people, but it makes the potential risks associated with exposure to the coronavirus all the more dangerous for me. But I’m not alone. 107 million people in the U.S. have pre-existing medical conditions like asthma and heart disease; the same pre-existing conditions that elevate their risk of facing a life-threatening situation were we to contract COVID-19. There are, however, tens of millions more house-bound Americans with a condition that is likely to be exacerbated by COVID-19: The energy burden.
The energy burden is…
