Eastern states reject transmission corridor


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today
The states of New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia are petitioning the federal government to reconsider designating dozens of their counties for the siting of a national priority, high-speed electricity transmission corridor.

On October 5, the Energy Department published its order designating two National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors - the Mid-Atlantic Corridor, and the Southwest Corridor.

The Mid-Atlantic Corridor includes counties in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Virginia, and all of New Jersey, Delaware, and the District of Columbia. The Southwest Area National Corridor includes counties in California and Arizona.

"These National Corridors serve as an important indication by the federal government that significant transmission constraint or congestion problems exist," said Energy Samuel Bodman, announcing the corridors in October. "The goal is simple - to keep reliable supplies of electric energy flowing to all Americans."

Also filing a petition with the department for a rehearing on the designation of the transmission corridors in the Southwest and mid-Atlantic were 20 environmental and conservation groups.

The states and groups say the Department of Energy, DOE, disregarded key energy issues, failed to consult with the states and failed to adequately assess potentially significant environmental impacts of the transmission corridors.

In their rehearing petitions, the states contend that federal agency exceeded its authority and would potentially usurp the states' authority to enforce their own environmental laws, regulations and policies.

"The designation of 47 counties in New York state as part of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor by DOE sets the stage for the federal government to preempt New York's legitimate oversight and process for reviewing and siting transmission projects within our state's borders," said Governor Eliot Spitzer.

"The federal government should not be able to overrule states' legitimate and well-established regulatory authority," Spitzer said. "New York State already has an efficient one-stop process for reviewing applications to build transmission facilities. The process includes detailed studies of the environmental impacts of a proposed facility, and provides a forum for stakeholders to weigh in on proposed projects."

The New York Department of Environmental Conservation, DEC, and the New York State Public Service Commission have filed separate petitions with seeking a rehearing of the corridor designation, Spitzer said.

DEC Commissioner Pete Grannis said, "This designation puts the goal of increasing energy transmission - regardless of environmental impacts - above New York's environmental laws and policies."

"In fact," said Grannis, "the designation raises many questions about impacts, from air quality to Forest Preserve land to natural heritage areas to wild and scenic rivers. Rather than bypassing environmental reviews, federal authorities should begin a full assessment at the earliest possible time to ensure that planning and decisions reflect environmental values."

Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell Friday asked the Energy Department to reconsider its decision to designate 52 counties in Pennsylvania as part of the Mid-Atlantic Corridor.

"This designation and action by the federal government is a blatant abuse of states' rights," said Governor Rendell. "There is no evidence to suggest that Pennsylvania's Public Utility Commission has ever obstructed a siting process or refused a proposed transmission project, so is unnecessary that such a large area of the state, and the citizens who live in those areas, be put in a position to accept transmission lines through their back yards."

"These transmission lines will be on our land and depreciate our property values, but they may not offer any benefit to Pennsylvania consumers," Rendell said. "Furthermore, they will be delivering dirtier, fossil-fuel-derived power from states to the south and west of Pennsylvania at a time when we're trying to protect the environment and meet our energy needs through clean and renewable technologies. This is simply unacceptable."

Virginia Governor Timothy Kaine, Attorney General Bob McDonnell and two Virginia congressmen asked the Energy Department Monday to reconsider inclusion of their state in the transmission corridor. They say the federal agency failed to comply with federal law by not consulting with the affected states when it designated the corridors.

If the Department of Energy does not act on a rehearing request within 30 days, the request is deemed to be denied.

Related News

Energy Ministry may lower coal production target as Chinese demand falls

Indonesia Coal Production Cuts reflect weaker China demand, COVID-19 impacts, falling HBA reference prices, and…
View more

Manitoba Hydro's burgeoning debt surpasses $19 billion

Manitoba Hydro Debt Load surges past $19.2B as the Crown corporation faces shrinking net income,…
View more

Nova Scotia regulator approves 14% electricity rate hike, defying premier

Nova Scotia Power Rate Increase 2023-2024 approved by the UARB lifts electricity rates 14 percent,…
View more

Ambitious clean energy target will mean lower electricity prices, modelling says

Australia Clean Energy Target drives renewables in the National Electricity Market, with RepuTex modelling and…
View more

Residential electricity use -- and bills -- on the rise thanks to more working from home

Work From Home Energy Consumption is driving higher electricity bills as residential usage rises. Smart…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.