'Volatile' Australia Electricity Market Concern
SYDNEY - - THE cost of electricity under the carbon price could rise further than the 10 per cent forecast by the government if major greenhouse emitters are made to pay unpredictable ''top-up fees'' on international permits, the power industry has warned.
As the government nuts out detail on the carbon price, to be introduced in July, power generators fear that uncertainty about carbon costs will interfere with the cut-price long-term deals they strike with electricity retailers, who keep the price of power down by making forward contracts of three years or more with power generators. Otherwise, retailers have to buy power on the spot market, which is considerably more expensive.
But under some options being canvassed by the government, power generators would have difficulty predicting their future carbon costs because of complex ''top-up fees'' on international permits, in turn making it impossible to make forward contracts.
This ''could increase volatility in the electricity market and further increase electricity prices'', the Energy Supply Association of Australia has warned in a submission to government.
Modelling commissioned by the association found that a 5 per cent fall in contracting in the National Electricity Market could lead to a 10 per cent rise in retail electricity prices for households and 15 per cent for large users. Treasury's modelling on the cost of the tax has estimated electricity prices will rise by about 10 per cent.
A spokesman for Climate Change Minister Greg Combet said loans would be available to eligible electricity generators to buy future carbon permits.
Related News
US judge orders PG&E to use dividends to pay for efforts to reduce wildfire risks
LOS ANGELES - A U.S. judge said on Tuesday that PG&E may not resume paying dividends and must use the money to fund its plan for cutting down trees to reduce the risk of wildfires in California, stopping short of more costly measures he proposed earlier this year.
The new criminal probation terms for PG&E are modest compared with ones the judge had in mind in January and that PG&E said could have cost upwards of $150 billion.
The terms will, however, keep PG&E under the supervision of Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California…