Activists urge a halt to new nuclear


Substation Relay Protection Training

Our customized live online or in‑person group training can be delivered to your staff at your location.

  • Live Online
  • 12 hours Instructor-led
  • Group Training Available
Regular Price:
$699
Coupon Price:
$599
Reserve Your Seat Today

Darlington Nuclear Reactors spark Ontario debate as Greenpeace and nurses urge postponing environmental assessment, citing safety, cost overruns, public health risks, and jobs impacts after Japan, amid election-season energy policy choices.

 

Breaking Down the Details

Planned reactors at Ontario's Darlington station, central to debate over safety, costs, and public health risks.

  • $33B investment plan faces calls to pause and review
  • Greenpeace and nurses urge postponing environmental hearings
  • Liberals and PCs support; NDP opposes expansion

 

Anti-nuclear activists are urging Ontario’s political leaders to scrap plans for new atomic reactors in the wake of the disaster in Japan.

 

Greenpeace and the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario were at Queen’s Park calling on Premier Dalton McGuinty to reconsider plans to invest $33 billion in the Darlington station.

“There has been no public assessment of the cost-effectiveness of new reactors and the environmental and safety reviews ignore the potential for accidents like we’re seeing in Japan,” said Shawn-Patrick Stensil, a Greenpeace nuclear analyst.

“At a minimum, the government should seek postponement of the environmental assessment hearings on new Darlington reactors that are scheduled to start March 21,” said Stensil.

Against the backdrop of an Oct. 6 election and a muted debate over the nuclear future in Ontario, both McGuinty and Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak support new reactors. Nuclear power accounted for 55 per cent of Ontario’s generation capacity last year.

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath opposes the expanded nuclear program, even as the province looks to lead a nuclear renaissance in Canada, and MPP Peter Tabuns Toronto-Danforth, her party’s energy critic, wrote the premier imploring him to slow down.

“Nuclear power is fraught with cost overruns and hidden costs ultimately borne by consumers,” warned Tabuns. “That waste — and the possibility of disasters like the current situation in Japan — hardly makes nuclear ‘clean’ and ‘emission free,’ as your government claims.”

But in a speech just prior to the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, McGuinty said “Ontario’s nuclear industry is an important part of Canada’s energy advantage.”

“Our plan will… build two new reactors at Darlington. The environmental assessment is starting this month. We are moving forward,” the premier said March 9, warning that Ottawa and Queen’s Park “need to be committed to its future and the 55,000 jobs it represents today.”

Doris Grinspun, executive director of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, said nurses “are increasingly concerned about the staggering health, environmental and economic costs of nuclear power.”

“The tragedy in Japan underlines the risk to public health,” said Grinspun.

“It is completely unacceptable that politicians are proposing to build new reactors without a transparent and robust assessment of their cost-effectiveness or safety.”

Under Ontario’s long-term energy plan, which was released last year after a report endorsing nuclear power informed the debate, the province will continue to get half its power supply from nuclear through 2030.

 

Related News

Related News

Drought, lack of rain means BC Hydro must adapt power generation

BC Hydro drought operations address climate change impacts with hydropower scheduling, reservoir management, water conservation,…
View more

Ontario Energy Board Sets New Electricity Rate Plan Prices and Support Program Thresholds

OESP Eligibility 2024 updates Ontario electricity affordability: TOU, Tiered, Ultra-Low-Overnight price plans, online bill calculator,…
View more

Massive power line will send Canadian hydropower to New York

Twin States Clean Energy Link connects New England to Hydro-Quebec via a 1,200 MW transmission…
View more

Hydro-Quebec shocks cottage owner with $5,300 in retroactive charges

Hydro-Quebec back-billing arises from analogue meter errors and estimated consumption, leading to arrears for electricity…
View more

Hydro One will keep running its U.S. coal plant indefinitely, it tells American regulators

Hydro One-Avista Merger outlines a utility acquisition shaped by Washington regulators, Colstrip coal plant depreciation,…
View more

Energy freedom and solar’s strategy for the South

South Carolina Energy Freedom Act lifts net metering caps, reforms PURPA, and overhauls utility planning…
View more

Sign Up for Electricity Forum’s Newsletter

Stay informed with our FREE Newsletter — get the latest news, breakthrough technologies, and expert insights, delivered straight to your inbox.

Electricity Today T&D Magazine Subscribe for FREE

Stay informed with the latest T&D policies and technologies.
  • Timely insights from industry experts
  • Practical solutions T&D engineers
  • Free access to every issue

Live Online & In-person Group Training

Advantages To Instructor-Led Training – Instructor-Led Course, Customized Training, Multiple Locations, Economical, CEU Credits, Course Discounts.

Request For Quotation

Whether you would prefer Live Online or In-Person instruction, our electrical training courses can be tailored to meet your company's specific requirements and delivered to your employees in one location or at various locations.