Latest Overhead T&D Articles

A fault indicator is an electrical device that detects and displays fault conditions in power systems. Used in distribution networks and switchgear, it improves fault detection, outage response, and grid reliability while supporting predictive maintenance.

What is a fault indicator?

A fault indicator is a monitoring device used in electrical distribution systems to quickly locate fault conditions and improve service reliability.

✅ Detects and displays fault conditions in power lines

✅ Enhances outage response and reduces downtime

✅ Supports predictive maintenance and grid efficiency

Understanding how this device functions and its role in maintaining a reliable power system is crucial for any electrician working in an industrial setting. Let’s explore the core concepts, their various applications, and the benefits they offer in terms of issue location, outage reduction, and overall system reliability. By reading this article, an industrial electrician will gain valuable insights into how a fault indicator contributes to safer, more efficient, and more resilient electrical infrastructure. Fault indicators play a crucial role in distribution automation, where remote monitoring and SCADA integration are essential for enhancing grid resilience.

They play a critical role in modern power systems by providing a rapid and reliable means of detecting and locating disturbances. These devices are essential for minimizing downtime, improving safety, and ensuring the efficient operation of electrical networks. In modern electrical distribution systems, fault indicators provide real-time fault location that speeds up troubleshooting and repair.

A faulted circuit indicator (FCI) is more than a simple signal device; it functions as a reliable circuit monitoring device that helps utilities quickly identify abnormal conditions. Whether used as an overhead line indicator on distribution networks or integrated into underground systems, these tools improve outage response and reduce downtime. When connected to SCADA fault detection platforms, they provide real-time data that supports proactive maintenance and rapid dispatch of crews. As utilities transition toward smart grid monitoring, advanced FCIs play a key role in creating safer, more resilient, and efficient power systems.

Fault Location/Detection

A primary function of these devices is to pinpoint the exact location of a circuit problem. This capability is crucial in complex networks with extensive overhead lines and underground cables. Overhead indicators are strategically placed along power lines to visually signal the presence of an issue. When a disturbance occurs, the indicator activates, providing a clear cue to line crews that enables them to quickly identify the affected section and commence repairs. Underground indicators are installed in cable systems and vaults to detect conditions beneath the surface. This precise location capability reduces the time and effort required to identify and address problems, resulting in faster restoration of service. Utilities that depend on reliable electric power distribution benefit from fault indicators to quickly identify and isolate problem areas.

Technology/Functionality

Modern FCIs sense both magnetic and electric fields to distinguish between normal load surges and true electrical events, enabling directional detection and avoiding false trips. With detection speeds measured in milliseconds, they provide real-time pinpointing. Current sensing remains a common approach, but advanced models also utilize digital signal processing (DSP) to minimize false alarms. Some units feature inrush restraint to prevent tripping during temporary surges. Remote indication capability enables the wireless transmission of data to SCADA systems or control centers, providing operators with immediate insight and facilitating the faster dispatch of crews.

Standards & Features

Leading designs include variable trip thresholds, multiple reset types, and low-pass filtering to minimize misoperations. Many models are hotstick-installable for safety and conform to IEEE compliance standards, ensuring reliability across diverse applications. These features not only enhance accuracy but also reduce maintenance requirements, enabling efficient long-term operation.

Historical Evolution

Since their introduction in the 1940s, these devices have evolved from simple manually reset flags to sophisticated electronic equipment. Early versions required crews to manually reset them after repairs. Over time, automatic reset functionality, LED indicators, and remote communication were added. Today’s smart indicators integrate programmable logic, data logging, and seamless communication with grid monitoring systems, reflecting decades of advancement in line sensor evolution. As electricity transmission networks expand, indicators become increasingly critical in maintaining safety and reducing large-scale outages.

Benefits

The benefits of using these monitors are numerous and far-reaching. By quickly identifying the affected circuit, they significantly reduce outage time, minimizing disruption to customers and businesses. This rapid location capability also enhances the overall reliability of the power system, as it enables faster repairs and restoration of service. They improve safety by enabling quick isolation of the affected section, preventing escalation and hazards to personnel. In wildfire-prone areas, indicators support rapid response strategies that reduce risks associated with downed lines and delayed detection.

Smart Grid Integration

Today’s FCIs are part of broader smart grid monitoring strategies. Integrated with SCADA systems, they provide operators with real-time situational awareness. Some advanced designs incorporate wireless transmitters and receivers that signal directly to protective relays, allowing for rapid and coordinated isolation. This integration improves grid resilience, reduces downtime, and supports predictive maintenance by identifying intermittent or developing issues before they escalate. With the rise of smart grid technologies, fault indicators are evolving into intelligent sensors that enhance monitoring and predictive maintenance.

Comparison of Indicator Types

Analysis

The strong emphasis on line location highlights its critical importance in power system management. Accurately pinpointing the source of a disturbance is paramount for efficient troubleshooting and timely restoration. The increasing adoption of real-time monitoring, inrush restraint, and remote indication demonstrates a trend toward more sophisticated management systems. This technological diversity enables greater flexibility and customization, meeting the specific needs of utilities, industrial facilities, and smart grid operators. In overhead T&D, fault indicators complement devices like the electrical insulator by improving protection against system faults.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a fault indicator, and how does it work?

It’s a device that detects and signals the presence of an abnormal condition in an electrical power system. It works by monitoring parameters such as current and voltage, triggering an alert when unusual activity is detected. This alert may be visual (flag or LED) or transmitted remotely to a control center.

What are the different types available?

They are categorized based on their application and functionality. Common types include:

• Overhead: Used on overhead lines, typically visual.

• Underground: Designed for cable vaults, often audible or remote.

• Electronic: Offer advanced features like DSP filtering, inrush restraint, and communication.

• Smart/SCADA: Fully integrated into monitoring and relay systems.

How do fault indicators improve power system reliability?

They reduce outage times, support immediate response through remote signaling, and enhance preventive maintenance by identifying intermittent problems before escalation.

What factors should be considered when selecting?

Consider factors such as application (overhead or underground), environmental conditions, functionality (visual vs. remote), accuracy, standards compliance, and installation requirements.

How are they installed and maintained?

Overhead indicators are typically pole-mounted, while underground versions are installed in vaults or directly on cables. Maintenance involves inspections, testing, and cleaning. Electronic units may require battery changes or firmware updates.

Do they ever give false alarms?

Advanced models use DSP filtering, inrush restraint, and directional detection to minimize false indications. Proper placement and settings further improve accuracy.

A fault indicator is an indispensable tool for maintaining the reliability and safety of modern power systems. From their origins in simple visual devices to today’s smart, SCADA-integrated models, their ability to quickly and accurately locate circuit issues significantly reduces outage times and improves overall grid resilience. By understanding their functions, standards, and benefits, electricians and system operators can make informed decisions that strengthen electrical infrastructure and support the transition to smarter, safer, and more efficient networks.

Related Articles

• Overhead T&D Channel

Costly interconnection delays stall grid connection for solar, wind, and storage, driven by interconnection queue backlogs, transmission constraints, lengthy permitting, and network upgrade studies, inflating project CAPEX, financing risk, and PPA timelines.

What Are Costly Interconnection Delays?

Delays in grid connection that create backlogs, raise upgrade costs, and push out timelines for energy projects.

✅ Queue backlogs extend interconnection studies and approvals

✅ Transmission constraints trigger costly network upgrades

✅ Financing and PPA milestones slip, increasing project risk

Utilities Have Found Ways To Save Time & Money

Policy debates on solar incentive and valuation make headlines across the nation, but less attention is paid to the nuts and bolts of solar installation: the interconnection process.

But the struggle there is very real. Take Hawaii, where the high queue of solar applications and slow interconnection process slowed down installations of distributed solar two years ago. Eventually the process was streamlined but it still wavers under the hefty weight of applications.

But performances by some of the busiest utilities in sunny states demonstrate that they have necessary skills to finish interconnections quickly. The new challenge lies in how to transfer those capabilities to utilities slow to catch on. These improvements also intersect with the rise of distributed energy resources, which require streamlined processes to connect efficiently.

The average time it takes from when the rooftop solar installation is finished to when the utilities gives it permission to operate increased from 28 days in 2014 to 45 days last year, according to data from a recent EQ Research survey. Longer queues can exacerbate stress on power distribution networks as crews juggle inspections, metering, and safety checks.

“It was one of the most surprising findings from the survey,” said Chelsea Barnes, EQ’s policy research manager and lead author of Comparing Utility Interconnection Timelines for Small-Scale Solar PV.

There are three overarching reasons why interconnection processes are slowing down, Barnes said.

“The number of interconnection applications is increasing, utilities are not prepared to handle more applications, and there are more applications for interconnections at parts of the distribution system near their interconnection capacities,” Barnes said.

“Many utilities are not prepared to handle the increasing volume of applications.”

Utilities interviewed by Utility Dive said there were some discrepancies in the numbers from EQ Research, which took their data set mostly from installers. But the conclusion was the same: slow interconnection queues didn’t help the growth of solar, leading those utilities to find ways to streamline the process.

For example, San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) moved to online applications when it saw interconnection applications start to rise rapidly, said Amber Albrecht, a spokesperson. Digitizing applicant intake dovetails with modern distribution automation practices that reduce manual handoffs and errors.

And Pepco won the Smart Electric Power Alliance 2016 IOU of the Year Award for its online application for residential and small business customers to help trim the interconnection process, a complaint the utility faced during proceedings over its proposed merger with Exelon.

Moving to an online application process trimmed the processing time by 10 days, according to William Ellis, Pepco’s manager for demand side management and green power connections.  

And Tucson Electric Power moved an automated system called PowerClerk that enabled their staff handling applications to tackle 4,000 requests last year, said Chris Lindsey, TEP’s manager of its distribution energy resources engineering group. Such tools are hallmarks of a smarter grid, aligning utility workflows with core smart grid capabilities for visibility and rapid decision-making.

The paper outlined a series of recommendations for all stakeholders to streamline the process, but it only works if all participants are at the table.

Number Discrepancies and What They Might Mean

EQ Research numbers depended on PV installers in 62 service areas spread out in 20 states and the District of Columbia. The group targeted areas with high residential solar penetration. But the numbers are incomplete, noted the group in an email to Utility Dive.

“The report is based on installer survey responses only.  We did send a survey to each utility asking for the same data, but only a couple responded, so we relied only on the installer data,” Barnes wrote in an email to Utility Dive. “Most utilities do not have to report interconnection timelines so we could not rely on public reports, either.”

Four utilities in high solar areas responded to Utility Dive requests their interconnection numbers.

San Diego Gas & Electric reported 27,202 applications in 2015, but EQ Research only noted 6,114 in their survey. TEP was another one, reporting roughly 4,000 applications in 2015 but EQ put the number at 1,808.

Possibly the biggest discrepancy lies in Southern California Electric’s numbers. In 2015, SCE reported 56,276 applications, but EQ reported 15,327.

Part of the discrepancy is likely due to EQ's limited samples and in part could be due to differing definitions of the interconnection intervals.

For some utility officials, the numbers didn’t match the data they supplied the group.

“The numbers EQ Research attributes to TEP seem a bit high and do not match the data that we supplied them in response to their survey,” TEP Renewables Program Manager Justin Orkney told Utility Dive.

The time between submitting the application and getting the green light to operate is also shorter than what the EQ survey showed, Orkney said.

Orkney said residential approvals took between 2 days and 3 days in 2014 and 2015 and most are being handled this year on the same day they are submitted.

But that is not the whole story, he added. “For 2016, TEP is averaging 16 calendar days between when the installer tells us the project has been inspected and when the status in PowerClerk (an online portal) is updated.”

The bulk of the difference between “same day” and the “16 calendar days” reports is that permission to operate work is not officially initiated until the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) issues its permit.

Despite the discrepancies between EQ’s data set and the few utilities surveyed by Utility Dive, the conclusions drawn from the research paper do highlight potential best practices for utilities to speed up the process.

Costs and Causes of Delays

The most important conclusion pulled from the paper is how interconnection delays play a role for utilities, customers and installers.

“It is underappreciated how much these delays have slowed solar growth, caused frustration for customers and installers, and burdened the utility industry,” Barnes said.

Both SDG&E’s Albrecht and TEP’s Orkney said the costs and burden to manually process the applications were hefty until their systems were automated. But the utilities didn’t disclose those amounts.

There is also significant cost to the customer, the paper noted.

“A hypothetical customer in Connecticut who installs a 7 kW system would be deprived of more than $150 in electricity generation for every month that interconnection is delayed,” the paper reports. “Multiplied over many individual systems, the cumulative costs are considerable.”

A National Renewable Energy Lab sturdy said interconnection delays are among many soft costs that make up 64% of the price of a residential solar array. The higher the costs, the bigger the price tag for the customer. Those costs also impact installers, with delays affecting final payments, slowing down their cash flow. It can also have a ripple effect, impacting word-of-mouth advertising for both installers and utilities, according to the paper.

Despite that, many utilities still depend on manual processes, such as mail-in applications, which could delay applications up to 100 days or more.

“The lack of online systems and automation is the main source of interconnection delays that may be as high as 100 days or more, the paper reports. “The challenge in this area may be convincing decision-makers that the long-term benefits outweigh the short-term costs.”

But an efficient system to process interconnection applications is the obvious solution for tackling delays, the researchers found, leading to cost savings down the road.

“Improvements to the interconnection process typically yield cost savings for the utility,” utility staff interviewed by EQ Research added. “The more user-friendly and automated the interconnection application system is, the less staff time is needed.”

EQ Research pushed for a more transparent, integrated process that would allow applicants to track the progress of that application.

Some utilities have streamlined their process and said they have already seen fewer delays and reduced time intervals between submitting and operating. For instance, SDG&E launched its system in 2013 and allows installers to obtain their permission to operate within 24 hours.

For Pepco customers, the utility established an online portal that processes signatures and fee payments, eliminating follow-up paperwork, Ellis told Utility Dive. The utility also engineered a semi-automated technical analysis of applications, which accelerates approval for residential solar arrays, Pepco’s Stephen Steffel told Utility Dive.

Reliability Concerns

Concerns over reliability are another big issue causing some interconnection delays. In solar-heavy states like Hawaii, some distribution system circuits and feeders are near their interconnection capacities, causing utilities and regulators to worry about grid congestion. Strategically deployed critical energy storage can absorb excess generation and smooth feeders during peak PV output.

EQ’s paper acknowledges “fewer data points” on the use of grid reliability as a reason for delays. But, in some places, it has added to tensions between utilities and solar installers.

“Some PV installers believe that utilities are overly cautious in some cases, or that utilities invoke grid reliability concerns as an excuse to delay application processing,” the paper reports. “Utility staff sometimes believe that the PV industry seeks special treatment not granted to other industries.”

One way to mitigate the tension is through regulatory proceedings. Requiring utilities to provide installers with maps or information showing interconnection congestion would allow installers to work around congested system locations.

Some utilities have have already done so, offering “interactive, web-based maps that allow installers to easily identify geographic areas where new DG facilities could encounter problems receiving approval for interconnection,” the paper reports. In parallel, well-planned microgrid projects can localize reliability and defer upgrades on constrained circuits.

“It is not yet common but utilities are starting to do it,” Barnes said.

When installers have that information, they can warn customers in congested areas that approvals will take longer and would likely cost more, she added. “They also can market to customers in less congested locations on the distribution system.”

Some utilities, including PG&E, SDG&E, and National Grid, have integrated automated checks for reliability and safety issues into their application processing, the paper reports. “Checking for concerns early in the application process can save utilities and installers time and money by avoiding the cost of engineer labor to review potential concerns.”

Best Practices

Some states have implemented reporting deadlines, but those so far are less than adequate to speed up interconnections, Barnes said. Those rules lack enforcement requirements or contain other shortcomings, leaving applications stuck in the process.

“Regulators and utilities need to be forward-thinking and to prepare for the renewable energy that state policies will bring onto the grid,” Barnes said,

The paper recommended simplified and accessible online systems with standardized forms as one way to streamline the process. Other methods include collaborating with stakeholders, expediting permitting, and combining the permitting and interconnection process. Keeping consistent rules and regulations as well as firm deadlines is another recommendation. Upgrading field equipment, including modern overhead switchgear innovation, helps integrate new PV safely while controlling capital costs.

Policymakers should keep rules and regulations consistent over the long term. Deadlines should be clear and firm. Regulators should require utilities to be transparent throughout processing, make grid capacity maps or data available to installers, and provide timeline performance reports.

Utilities, regulators, and AHJs should also collaborate to improve the standardization, according to the paper. And if policymakers fail to act, utilities can voluntarily automate grid reliability and penetration data and make grid capacity maps or grid capacity data available to installers. Utilities should also facilitate advanced meter installation. Meanwhile, part of the burden lies with installers to track utility performance and make the source of their findings publicly available.

“Regulators, utilities, AHJs, installers, and customers can all benefit from the experiences and lessons learned in other jurisdictions and from communication among stakeholders, ”the paper concluded.

“Each of these industry participants can encourage and facilitate workshops, webinars, trainings, and other education and outreach activities to enable such learning experiences.”

Related Articles

• Transmission And Distribution Channel

Ac transmission lines deliver alternating current across the power grid using high voltage, overhead conductors, and insulators, controlling reactive power, impedance, and corona effects to minimize losses, improve efficiency, and ensure reliable long-distance electricity transmission.

What Are AC Transmission Lines?

Ac transmission lines carry high-voltage AC power long distances with minimal losses.

✅ Typical voltages: 69 kV to 765 kV; higher reduces I2R losses

✅ Requires reactive power compensation: shunt capacitors, SVC, STATCOM

✅ Design factors: conductor bundling, corona control, insulation coordination

Three-phase electric power systems are used for high and extra-high voltage AC transmission lines (50kV and above). The pylons must therefore be designed to carry three (or multiples of three) conductors. The towers are usually steel lattices or trusses (wooden structures are used in Germany in exceptional cases) and the insulators are generally glass discs assembled in strings whose length is dependent on the line voltage and environmental conditions. One or two earth conductors (alternative term: ground conductors) for lightning protection are often added to the top of each pylon. For background on material properties, the electrical insulator overview provides relevant design considerations.

Detail of the insulators (the vertical string of discs) and conductor vibration dampers (the weights attached directly to the cables) on a 275,000 volt suspension pylon near Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, England. In some countries, pylons for high and extra-high voltage are usually designed to carry two or more electric circuits. For double circuit lines in Germany, the “Danube” towers or more rarely, the “fir tree” towers, are usually used. If a line is constructed using pylons designed to carry several circuits, it is not necessary to install all the circuits at the time of construction. Medium voltage circuits are often erected on the same pylons as 110 kV lines. Paralleling circuits of 380 kV, 220 kV and 110 kV-lines on the same pylons is common. Sometimes, especially with 110 kV-circuits, a parallel circuit carries traction lines for railway electrification. Additional context on span lengths, conductor bundles, and right of way is covered in this transmission lines reference for practitioners.

High Voltage DC Transmission Pylons

High voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines are either monopolar or bipolar systems. With bipolar systems a conductor arrangement with one conductor on each side of the pylon is used. For single-pole HVDC transmission with ground return, pylons with only one conductor cable can be used. In many cases, however, the pylons are designed for later conversion to a two-pole system. In these cases, conductor cables are installed on both sides of the pylon for mechanical reasons. Until the second pole is needed, it is either grounded, or joined in parallel with the pole in use. In the latter case, the line from the converter station to the earthing (grounding) electrode is built as underground cable. Engineers can review converter topologies, pole configurations, and control methods in the direct current technology guide to inform design choices.

Guidance on electrode placement, resistivity, and corrosion protection is summarized in the grounding electrodes overview relevant to HVDC return paths.

Raliway Traction Line Pylons

Pylons used for single-phase AC railway traction lines are similar in construction to pylons used for 110 kV-three phase lines. Steel tube or concrete poles are also often used for these lines. However, railway traction current systems are two-pole AC systems, so traction lines are designed for two conductors (or multiples of two, usually four, eight, or twelve). As a rule, the pylons of railway traction lines carry two electric circuits, so they have four conductors. These are usually arranged on one level, whereby each circuit occupies one half of the crossarm. For four traction circuits the arrangement of the conductors is in two-levels and for six electric circuits the arrangement of the conductors is in three levels. With limited space conditions, it is possible to arrange the conductors of one traction circuit in two levels. Running a traction power line parallel to high-voltage transmission lines for threephase AC on a separate crossarm of the same pylons is possible. If traction lines are led parallel to 380 kV-lines, the insulation must be designed for 220 kV because, in the event of a fault, dangerous overvoltages to the three-phase alternating current line can occur. Traction lines are usually equipped with one earth conductor. In Austria, on some traction circuits, two earth conductors are used. Integration with substation feeders and sectioning posts must align with the power distribution practices used along the route.

Types Of Pylons

Specific Functions:

• anchor pylons (or strainer pylons) utilize horizontal insulators and occur at the endpoints of conductors.
• pine pylon – an electricity pylon for two circuits of three-phase AC current, at which the conductors are arranged in three levels. In pine pylons, the lowest crossbar has a wider span than that in the middle and this one a larger span than that on the top.
• Twisting pylons are anchor pylons at which the conductors are “twisted” so that they exchange sides of the pylon.
• long distance anchor pylon

A long distance anchor pylon is an anchor pylon at the end of a line section with a long span. Large gaps between pylons reduces the restraints on the movement of the attached conductors. In such situations, conductors may be able to swing into contact with each during high wind, potentially creating a short circuit. Long distance anchor pylons must be very stably built due to the large weight of the exceptionally long cables. They are implemented occasionally as portal pylons. In extreme cases, long distance anchor pylons are constructed in pairs, each supporting only a single cable, in an effort to reduce the strain of large spans.

Branch Pylon: In the layout of an overhead electrical transmission system, a branch pylon denotes a pylon which is used to start a line branch. The branch pylon is responsible for holding up both the main-line and the start of the branch line, and must be structured so as to resist forces from both lines. Branch pylons frequently, but not always, have one or more cross beams transverse to the direction of travel of the line for the admission of the branching electric circuits. There are also branch pylons where the cross beams of the branching electric circuits lie in the direction of travel of the main line. Branch pylons without additional cross beams are occasionally constructed. Branch pylons are nearly always anchor pylons (as they normally must ground the forces from the branch line). Branch pylons are often constructed similarly to final pylons; however, at a branch pylon the overhead line resumes in both directions, as opposed to only one direction as with a final pylon.

 Anchor Portal: An anchor portal is a support structure for overhead electrical power transmission lines in the form of a portal for the installation of the lines in a switchyard. Anchor portals are almost always steel-tube or steel-framework constructions.

 Termination Pylon: Anchor pylons or strainer pylons utilize horizontal insulators and occur at the endpoints of conductors. Such endpoints are necessary when interfacing with other modes of power transmission (see image) and, due to the inflexibility of the conductors, when significantly altering the direction of the pylon chain. Anchor pylons are also employed at branch points as branch pylons and must occur at a maximum interval of 5 km, due to technical limitations on conductor length. Conductors are connected at such pylons by a short conductor cable “strained” between both ends. They often require anchor cables to compensate for the asymmetric attachment of the conductors. Therefore, anchor pylons tend to be more stably built than a support pylon and are often used, particularly in older construction, when the power line must cross a large gap, such as a railway line, river, or valley. A special kind of an anchor pylon is a termination pylon. It is used for the transition of an overhead powerline to an underground cable. A termination pylon at which the powerline runs further as well as overhead line and as underground cable is a branch pylon for a cable branch. For voltages below 30kV, pylon transformers are also used. Twisted pylons are anchor pylons at which the conductors are “twisted” so that they exchange sides of the pylon. Anchor pylons may also have a circuit breaker attached to their crossbeam. These so called switch pylons are operated from the ground by the use of long sticks. The attachment of circuit breakers to pylons is only practical when voltages are less than 50kV. Where sectionalizing or protection is required aloft, utilities are adopting overhead switchgear innovations to reduce footprint and maintenance.

Materials Used

• Wood Pylon
• Concrete Pylon
• Steel Tube Pylon
• Lattice Steel Pylon

Conductor Arrangements

Portal Pylon: In electricity distribution, a portal pylon is a type of pylon with which the cross beams on the conductor cables rest on at least two towers. Portal pylons can be made of wood, concrete, steel tubing or steel lattice. They are used in German railroad wiring because of their enormous space requirement as a rule only for anchor pylons, which have to resist high traction power and as bases for lines in switchgears as anchor portals. Their application and clearances are coordinated with prevailing electrical distribution systems standards for safe operation.

Delta Pylon: A delta pylon is a type of support structure for high-voltage electric power transmission lines. The pylon has a V-shapedtop for the admission of the cross beam. Delta pylons are usually established only for one electric circuit, occasionally for two electric circuits. They are used for voltages up to 765 kV. Delta pylons are far more common in the USA, France, Spain, Italy and formerYugoslavia, while in Germany on delta pylons shifted high voltage transmission lines are very rare.

Single-level Pylon: A single-level pylon is an electricity pylon for an arrangement of all conductor cables on a pylon in one level. The singlelevel pylon leads to a low height of the pylons, connected with the requirement for a large right of way. It is nearly always used for overhead lines for high-voltage direct current transmissions and traction current lines. If three-phase current is used, if the height of pylons may not exceed a certain value.

Two-level Pylon: A two-level pylon is a pylon at which the circuits are arranged in two levels on two crossbars. Two-level pylons are usually designed to carry four conductors on the lowest crossbar and two conductors at the upper crossbar, but there are also other variants, e.g. carrying six conductors in each level or two conductors on the lowest and four on the upper crossbar. Two-level pylons are commonplace in former West-Germany, and are also called Donau pylons after the river Danube.

Three-level Pylon: A three-level pylon is a pylon designed to arrange conductor cables on three crossbars in three levels. For two three-phase circuits (6 conductor cables), it is usual to use fir tree pylons and barrel pylons. Three-level pylons are taller than other pylon types, but require only a small right-of-way. They are very popular in a number of countries.

Three-level Pylon: A three-level pylon is a pylon designed to arrange conductor cables on three crossbars in three levels. For two three-phase circuits (6 conductor cables), it is usual to use fir tree pylons and barrel pylons. Three-level pylons are taller than other pylon types, but require only a small right-of-way. They are very popular in a number of countries.

From: Overhead and Underground T&D Handbook, Volume 1, The Electricity Forum

Related Articles

• Transmission And Distribution Channel

Single electricity market links regional grids, enabling cross-border trade, renewable integration, and competitive prices. It harmonizes regulations, strengthens energy security, and balances consumption for reliable, efficient, and sustainable electricity supply.

What is a Single Electricity Market?

How Overhead Switchgear Innovation Cost Effectively? Advanced medium-voltage reclosers, vacuum interrupters, and SCADA-enabled smart sensors enhance reliability, reduce arc-flash risk, cut lifecycle maintenance, and optimize distribution networks for grid modernization and predictive maintenance.

How Overhead Switchgear Innovation Cost Effectively?

Deploy SCADA-ready reclosers, vacuum tech, and sensors to boost reliability, cut OPEX, and extend asset life.

✅ Medium-voltage reclosers and sectionalizers lower fault costs

✅ Vacuum interrupters reduce maintenance and minimize arc-flash hazards

✅ SCADA, IoT sensors enable predictive maintenance and uptime

BACKGROUND
Achieving many of the globe’s top priorities depends on an unprecedented expansion of electric generation capacity. A report released last year by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), for example, forecast that achieving net-zero carbon emissions in the U.S. by mid-century would require a nearly 500 percent increase in electricity generating capacity.
A decarbonized future powered largely by renewable electricity generation depends on a reliable grid, especially the transmission grid. A new report by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine in the U.S. laid out a blueprint for achieving 2050 net-zero goals, and strengthening and expanding the transmission system was a key component because the transmission system is so important both to integrating renewables and delivering clean energy to where it is consumed. The reliability of the transmission and sub-transmission grid is particularly vital as clean electricity is increasingly relied on to fuel transportation, heating and cooling, and manufacturing and industrial processes. Indeed, the ability to sectionalize and reroute power when an outage hits the sub-transmission system has an outsized impact on reliability because high-voltage grids serve so many homes and businesses. As planners modernize regional networks, an understanding of electricity transmission principles helps explain how long-distance power flows and interconnections support resilience.
The high costs and environmental impacts of status quo solutions
G&W Electric’s Viper®-HV overhead switchgear solution is an important innovation in efforts to simultaneously reduce utility operating expenses (OPEX), improve sub-transmission grid reliability, and integrate more renewables. The genesis of the Viper-HV switching solution was when two utilities approached G&W Electric, one of the U.S.’s largest recloser and switchgear manufacturers, with the request that the company develop a 72.5 kV recloser able to switch and sectionalize sub-transmission power lines to maintain reliability. Deployed on critical transmission lines, such devices expand sectionalizing options without the footprint of new substations.
The reason the utilities and the wider industry were so keen on an overhead solid dielectric solution able to enhance sub-transmission grid reliability was because existing options were inadequate – especially because the sub-transmission system needs both the ability to sectionalize the grid to maintain reliability when faults occur and because it demands advanced monitoring to quickly detect, locate, and respond to outages. Historically, sectionalizing the sub-transmission grid has been handled by motor-operated switches that were insulated either by air or gases such as SF6. Because these products are mechanical devices, they require frequent inspection and maintenance. Not only does this put stress on already tight utility OPEX budgets and a workforce stretched thin by retirements, mechanical devices exposed to the elements can also fail. Utilities increasingly pair such equipment with distribution automation strategies to accelerate fault isolation and service restoration.
Overhead switchgear innovation drives desired and unexpected sub-transmission grid benefits
Development of the Viper-HV overhead switchgear solution took years, with significant input from customers and industry experts. But the advances made deliver important benefits to sub-transmission grid reliability and intelligence, along with improved costs. Indeed, the Viper-HV is a solid dielectric overhead switchgear solution that can respond quickly to temporary faults and deliver the sectionalizing the utilities originally requested, as well as serving as a creative alternative to circuit breakers and bringing reclosing capabilities where applicable. These capabilities align with broader smart grid objectives that emphasize pervasive sensing, coordinated control, and adaptive protection.
Manufactured with a robust, proprietary, time-proven process, the Viper-HV solution is made to solve several pressing sub-transmission grid reliability and cost concerns. For example, it is made to complete a minimum of 10,000 operations without any need for maintenance – which delivers relief to utility OPEX budgets and frees up limited staff for other tasks. Reduced maintenance cycles also streamline power distribution workflows and spare-parts planning for field crews.
Besides providing a low-cost, no-maintenance solution for sub-transmission grid sectionalizing, advanced reclosing technology is important for other reasons as well, including:
Precise location of faults for rapid power restoration
One of the primary challenges facing utilities trying to restore power when there is an outage is finding the fault that caused it. Existing solutions can approximate the location of a fault, which still requires utility personnel to devote precious time to pinpointing its exact location – often in harsh weather conditions – which results in longer restoration times and customer and regulator frustration. The Viper-HV overheard switchgear solution can be equipped with controllers with built-in intelligence enabling precise fault location. The Viper-HV solution includes switching technology plus controllers to include not just impedancebased algorithms but traveling wave fault location determination, which is suitable on longer sub-transmission lines. While most sub-transmission applications are AC, awareness of evolving direct current technology informs protection coordination, converter siting, and interoperability decisions.
Rapid and less costly integration of renewables
Many nations are accelerating deployments of renewable energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and achieve ambitious decarbonization targets. Distributed energy resources (DERs) like solar and wind increasingly connect to the transmission and sub-transmission grid – especially when an extra transmission line is added to existing infrastructure to take advantage of an advantageous renewable energy location. DERs introduce complexity to the grid, including more frequent switching than is normal on sub-transmission feeders. The Viper-HV technology, since it was certified as a recloser with 10,000 operations capability, is more suitable than traditional motor operated switches. Furthermore, the form factor of the Viper-HV overhead switchgear is easier to install than other solutions. Pairing sectionalizing schemes with strategically sited critical energy storage can further smooth variability and enhance grid stability during switching events.
Removes need to add expensive and time-consuming grid infrastructure
Another significant benefit of advanced overhead switchgear technology: it can avoid the necessity to add new substations. In cases when a new feeder and circuit breaker need to be added to a sub-transmission system substation, the Viper-HV overhead switchgear solution can increase the speed and lower the cost. That’s because traditional circuit breakers need to be ground-mounted on a concrete pad, which takes up space many substations don’t have and involves permitting that can take a lot of time. By contrast, the Viper-HV overhead switchgear solution can be mounted on the already grounded metal frames most substations have available. This takes no additional space and doesn’t require a time-consuming permitting process.
Advances in technology are essential for increasing the reliability and resiliency of the sub-transmission grid. At the same time, these technologies must lower, rather than elevate, the total overall costs including all aspects of the installation and lifecycle costs (i.e. maintenance, replacement). Sophisticated overhead switchgear technology provides a budget-friendly option for enhancing reliability, resiliency, and helping to green the power grid.
 

Related Articles

• Transmission And Distribution Channel

Transmission lines carry electrical power and RF signals with characteristic impedance, distributed parameters, attenuation, reflection, and phase velocity, enabling efficient power distribution, signal integrity, impedance matching, and low-loss, high-voltage transmission.

What Are Transmission Lines?

Transmission lines are conductors that guide power or RF signals with defined impedance to minimize loss and reflections.

✅ Distributed RLC parameters define impedance and propagation.

✅ Proper termination reduces reflections and VSWR.

✅ Used in high-voltage grids, coaxial cables, and microstrip.

Transmission lines are crucial in delivering electric power from generating stations to consumers. These vital power system components ensure that electrical energy reaches homes, businesses, and industries efficiently and safely. This article explores transmission lines' fundamentals, types, materials, and environmental impact. For a broader grid perspective, see how electricity transmission integrates generation, substations, and long-distance corridors in practice.

Types of Transmission Lines

There are two main categories of transmission lines: overhead and underground. Overhead lines, the most common type, are suspended above the ground using transmission towers. These structures facilitate electric power transportation over long distances at high voltage levels. Overhead lines are cost-effective and easy to maintain but can be visually unappealing and susceptible to weather-related damage. Utilities increasingly deploy advanced overhead switchgear innovation to improve reliability and fault isolation on exposed spans.

On the other hand, underground power cables are buried beneath the ground and are generally used in urban areas or environmentally sensitive regions. Although less prone to weather-related issues and more visually pleasing, they are more expensive to install and maintain. In dense urban networks, coordinated electrical distribution systems planning helps align cable routes with load centers and maintenance access.

Understanding the Functioning of Transmission Lines

Transmission lines are responsible for carrying electrical energy from power generation facilities to substations located near consumers. These lines consist of conductors typically made of copper or aluminum. The conductors are designed to have a specific cross-sectional area to accommodate the flow of electrical current without causing excessive power losses or overheating. For certain corridors and submarine links, modern direct current technology can lower losses and improve controllability compared with conventional AC lines.

The flow of electrical energy along transmission lines is subject to certain natural phenomena, such as electromagnetic fields, which can influence the line's performance. Engineers design transmission lines with a specific characteristic impedance to minimize these effects and ensure efficient power transmission. This parameter measures the line's opposition to alternating current (AC) flow at a particular frequency.

Minimizing Transmission Line Losses

Power losses along transmission lines are an important concern in electrical engineering. These losses occur due to the resistance of the conductors and can lead to decreased efficiency and higher operational costs. Therefore, engineers employ various techniques to minimize line losses, such as selecting low-resistance conductors, optimizing conductor size, and using higher voltage levels for long-distance power transmission. These strategies ultimately support resilient power distribution by reducing upstream transmission inefficiencies that propagate through the grid.

Materials Used in Transmission Lines

Conductors for transmission lines are commonly made of copper or aluminum, both of which offer good conductivity and mechanical strength. The choice of material depends on factors such as cost, availability, and environmental considerations. Transmission towers are typically constructed from steel or aluminum, offering strength and durability while minimizing weight. Line hardware selections often include durable glass electrical insulators to provide mechanical strength while maintaining excellent dielectric performance.

Environmental Impacts of Transmission Lines

The construction and operation of transmission lines can have significant environmental impacts. The visual effects on landscapes and the potential harm to wildlife, such as birds colliding with conductors, are key concerns for overhead lines. Electromagnetic fields produced by transmission lines have also raised concerns about potential health effects on humans, although research has not provided conclusive evidence of harm. Appropriate specification of each electrical insulator can mitigate leakage currents and flashover risks that might otherwise affect habitats and nearby communities.

In contrast, underground power distribution lines have a smaller visual impact and pose fewer risks to wildlife. However, their installation can disturb ecosystems and contribute to soil erosion. Additionally, the materials used in transmission lines and towers can have environmental consequences, such as the energy required for their production and waste materials disposal.

Comparing Underground and Overhead Transmission Lines

Both overhead and underground transmission lines have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. Overhead lines are more cost-effective and easier to maintain but are more susceptible to weather-related damage and have a greater visual impact on the environment. Underground lines offer aesthetic and environmental benefits but are more expensive to install and maintain. The choice between the two options largely depends on budget, location, and ecological considerations.

In conclusion, transmission lines are essential electrical grid components, enabling the efficient distribution of electric power across vast distances. Understanding these lines' types, materials, and environmental implications is crucial for making informed decisions about their design, installation, and maintenance. Engineers and planners can develop transmission infrastructure that balances cost, efficiency, and environmental concerns by considering all relevant factors.

Ensuring electrical energy's continued and efficient flow is paramount for modern society. The various transmission lines, such as overhead lines and underground power cables, have unique benefits and challenges. We can work towards more effective and sustainable power distribution solutions by understanding the materials used, the way transmission lines function, and the potential environmental impacts.

The role of transmission lines in the electrical grid cannot be overstated. As technology advances and our reliance on electricity grows, it is increasingly important to understand these essential components thoroughly. Through diligent research and continuous innovation, we can continue improving the efficiency and sustainability of our power systems, ensuring a reliable and secure electricity supply for generations to come.

Addressing the questions and concerns surrounding transmission lines can promote greater awareness and understanding of this vital aspect of our power infrastructure. As we seek innovative solutions for efficient power delivery, we can look forward to a future with more sustainable and environmentally friendly electrical transmission systems.

Transmission lines are an integral part of the electric power system, critical in delivering electrical energy from power generation facilities to consumers. Understanding the various aspects of transmission lines, such as their types, functioning, materials, and environmental impact, is essential for the ongoing development and maintenance of efficient and sustainable power distribution infrastructure. As we continue to advance in our understanding and innovation, the future of transmission lines promises increased efficiency, sustainability, and reliability for future generations.

Related Articles

• Transmission And Distribution Channel