San Antonio utility reaches nuke plant settlement

subscribe

A consortium working to double the generating capacity of the South Texas nuclear power plant has agreed to buy up much of the San Antonio city-owned utility's stake in the project, both sides announced recently.

According to statements issued by CPS Energy of San Antonio and a consortium of NRG Energy and Toshiba, the consortium will assume all but less than 8 percent of the 40 percent CPS stake in the plant's proposed third and fourth nuclear generation units.

The consortium, Nuclear Innovation North America, also will pay $80 million to CPS, donate $10 million to San Antonio's Residential Energy Assistance Partnership and assume management control of the project.

In return, CPS has stopped paying into the project as of January 31. The San Antonio Express-News reports CPS had spent $370 million on the project, situated 65 miles southwest of Houston near Bay City.

The settlement will be considered by the CPS board. If approved, it would mean the end of a $32 billion claim CPS made against NINA.

"The agreement extracts the maximum value for our community at this stage of the project's development. It accounts for our investment to date and the value of the site with land and water rights," said Jelynne LeBlanc Burley, CPS acting general manager.

CPS had wanted to reduce its payments toward the $13 billion project. A CPS statement says it will still get 200 megawatts more of electricity from the finished project, or about a third of its future needs by 2020.

Under the agreement, CPS would continue to support NINA's application for federal nuclear loan guarantees.

Steve Winn, NINA chief executive, said in a statement that the agreement allows the consortium "to continue developing one of the leading nuclear power projects in the country."

However, environmental and consumer activists hope the withdrawal of CPS as a full partner in the project signals an end to the project.

Tom "Smitty" Smith, Texas director of the Public Citizen activist group, said in a statement that the CPS withdrawal "demonstrates nuclear plants are too costly and risky to build."

Related News

bitcoin electricity

The Great Debate About Bitcoin's Huge Appetite For Electricity Determining Its Future

NEW YORK - There is a great debate underway about the electricity required to process Bitcoin transactions. The debate is significant, the stakes are high, the views are diverse, and there are smart people on both sides. Bitcoin generates a lot of emotion, thereby producing too much heat and not enough light. In this post, I explain the importance of identifying the key issues in the debate, and of understanding the nature and extent of disagreement about how much electrical energy Bitcoin consumes.

Consider the background against which the debate is taking place. Because of its unstable price, Bitcoin cannot serve…

READ MORE
heatwave

Sask. sets new record for power demand

READ MORE

holiday scam warning

Ontario's five largest electricity providers join together to warn of holiday scams

READ MORE

africa electricity future

Putting Africa on the path to universal electricity access

READ MORE

west virgina dam

Lawmakers question FERC licensing process for dams in West Virginia

READ MORE